Maggie5
Moderator
- Moderator
- #651
USA and Japan printing their currency into the ground.
They call it quantitative easing.
Isn't UK doing it as well?
http://www.bbc.com/news/business-15198789
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
USA and Japan printing their currency into the ground.
They call it quantitative easing.
Isn't UK doing it as well?
http://www.bbc.com/news/business-15198789
Mr Hockey said the government’s determination to rein in entitlements was designed to shore up the sustainability of our quality of life.
“It is about what we want to be in 5, 10, 20 years' time and I often ask myself if there's a drug that's going to save my child's life in 10 years' time and I couldn't afford it, I would expect the government to help me out,’’ he said.
“Now in 10 years' time is the government going to have the money to be able to afford that drug? They might have it today but they won't have it tomorrow unless we actually start fixing the budget now.”
You mouthed off about the ADF going into Indonesian territorial waters and the Navy navigation skills which I had to laugh at; always learning I think you said!
Damning indictment of the last govt.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-03-13/imf-chart-change-real-expenditure/5314708
Funny you took that graph from an article, but didn't link to the actual article, even though it said Hockey's claims were correct. Was it because the graphs Hockey used don't seem consitent (using different countries from graph to graph)? Or because the article also mentioned how low our debt was overall? Given Hockey is now pointing at G20 countries and saying they're too far in debt to use fiscal policy to improve their economic situation, maybe no Liberal wants to point out just how far lower Australia's debt is?Damning indictment of the last govt.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-03-13/imf-chart-change-real-expenditure/5314708
Actually in this case you can. But then you'd actually have to read and comprehend what people wrote in order to understand that.How can debt NOT increase when you inherit a budget deficit?
Imagine if Hockey actually did the right thing and cut spending by 4%gdp. The fanbois would go in to a Keynesian rage and say he was destroying the economy.
You cant have it both ways.
I've been asking for ages why RBA figures had us still in $60B debt, but the Libs say they paid off the debt. Can you illuminate us on this seemingly simple question, given how often you claim to be an economic guru? I figure asking a question where the answer should be a positive for the Liberals might actually get you to show off some of your so called knowledge, rather than your usual unverified claims of intelligence.Produce whatever graph you like, the result is the same. Zero net debt left by the Libs.
Actually in this case you can. But then you'd actually have to read and comprehend what people wrote in order to understand that.
Hockey has gamed the figures to give Australia "the fastest budget deterioration over the past six months of any of the world’s 29 most advanced economies tracked by the International Monetary Fund". He is creating the budget emergency so he can then react to it. Now how about you provide some links for your claims?
I've been asking for ages why RBA figures had us still in $60B debt, but the Libs say they paid off the debt.
He is creating the budget emergency so he can then react to it.
Just a small question.... What currency does Australia use to pay off it's debt?
If in Australian dollars, why not buy US$ when it was at it's highest and even now, than change back to AUD when the time is right?
Does Treasury go into the money market?
AUD.
Hockey/RBA has already gambled $8 Billion on that very prospect.
Just a small question.... What currency does Australia use to pay off it's debt?
If in Australian dollars, why not buy US$ when it was at it's highest and even now, than change back to AUD when the time is right?
Does Treasury go into the money market?
AOFM.gov.au has all your answers.
Regards
S. Pete
what price did they lock in at?
What was the AUD in October last year?
http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/business/trader-joe-playing-the-forex-tables-20131025-2w5v6.html
about par still
So Hockey is currently $150 million in the hole then based on the interest payments from that article.
assuming it has been a buy and hold and in addition not receiving interest on bonds held
The ABC has learned a number of Medicare Local chief executives have been told the Federal Government plans to shut down the current system.
Speculation has been mounting that the local health bodies, which were set up under the Rudd government in a $1.8 billion initiative to organise community-specific health programs, will be scrapped in next month's budget.
I really can't understand how Abbott and Hockey think that introducing a $6 GP visit is good for the budget. Yes it may save $750m in bulk billing fees, but at what cost? Those on or below the poverty line will now forgo a doctors appointment because of the cost, others will roll up to already overcrowded emergency rooms at hospitals seeking treatment for something trivial.
I have long said that people going to an emergency room for unnecessary treatment should be charged a fee. This would push them back to medical clinics thus improving our hospital system.
Instead they will continue to allow tax concession on superannuation contributions of the rich which is costing the budget billions.
http://www.theage.com.au/federal-po...at-are-killing-the-budget-20140421-zqx7p.html
But I guess that I shouldn't be surprised that a Liberal government would want to screw over the poor and disadvantaged to help line the pockets of their mates.
This is the first that I have heard that it will be rolled back into health and that it will be capped. Source?
Not so sure about your last statement as last time I heard it was going into consolidated revenue just like Medibank.just heard it on the news tonight and same; it was the first time I heard the cap and the re-investment being reported.
I guess media and the "news" focuses on the hype and fear rather than providing information.
$72 might not be much to you, but take a person living under the poverty line in this country, they struggle to put food on the table each day for themselves and their families, struggle to pay the rent and keep a roof over their head, every single cent is counted, food is brought not on quality but on price, $6 is the price of a meal for a family of 4, so do you go without food or do you feed your family? This is a very realistic situation for many people in our society and if you don't believe it then get out from behind your computer and go do some volunteer work with the Salvos and see how many in society really live.The $750m is being rolled back into health, which may provide better quality service.
oh and the $6 is capped at $72 a year so no big issue.