Oppo Camp Delusional Pearlers III

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
The Richmond board believes Jake King deserves to be part of the Grand Final day motorcade. :drunk:

Also seems to be a general consensus on there that Conca will get two weeks. :drunk::drunk:
 
Dave said:
"Their supporters don't do banter threads well, we won't have one with them"
Click to expand...
Hmmm so would that be from a certain yellow and black team in relation to our team where the main part of their banter revolved around da drugz?

I did have some sympathy for some of their supporters who did want to interact with our guys but to the main the thread just became a s**t fight to which our guys stopped posting
 
if you actually watched it, he doesn't make contact with his head. It's a glancing blow to the back of his neck. 2 weeks max.
Click to expand...

Conkey Punch
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Not about us (despite a Lance Armstrong reference) but still giggle worthy.

Players like Crowley are no better then Lance Armstrong, both exists in their sports by cheating their way to the top and prevent others who are more talented and unwilling to cheat from the limelight they deserve. You might try and distinguish between the two but I won't, all cheats are the same and deserve to be punished for their actions.

Obviously the gist of king hitting them is to punish that action which is preferable to the way things currently stand, ignoring it makes you no better then the cheats themselves.
Click to expand...
 
At the risk of crossing into innapropriate content, found this pearler by a 9thmond fan, on the norf "*" fred (thread).

"Worse still, I had a Carlton supporting friend complaining on FB on Thursday night about being rimmed "yet again". I pointed out afterwards that Carlton have 'won' the free kick count in 15 of their 18 games this year (inc 24-14 in the Thursday night 'injustice') with a +65 diff ... the most in the league by an absolute mile. Amazing".

I'm thinking he/she means "reamed", as opposed to the descriptor used. NSFW alert. Probably should have put that first, oops.
 
The Scales said:
At the risk of crossing into innapropriate content, found this pearler by a 9thmond fan, on the norf "*" fred (thread).

"Worse still, I had a Carlton supporting friend complaining on FB on Thursday night about being rimmed "yet again". I pointed out afterwards that Carlton have 'won' the free kick count in 15 of their 18 games this year (inc 24-14 in the Thursday night 'injustice') with a +65 diff ... the most in the league by an absolute mile. Amazing".

I'm thinking he/she means "reamed", as opposed to the descriptor used. NSFW alert. Probably should have put that first, oops.
Click to expand...

That is delusional, I think we all know most Carlolton supporters are more likely to complain that they haven't received a good rimming.
 
Last edited:
EnolaGay said:
That is delusional, I think we all know most Carlolton supporters are more likely to complain that they haven't received a good riming.
Click to expand...
Just spat my coffee out.
Thanks for the wake up
 
Harlequin said:
Just spat my coffee out.
Thanks for the wake up
Click to expand...
I just spat mine out too, but that's because I just realised the instant at work is decaf. No wonder it tastes even worse than normal for instant.
 
Matthew_Lloyd said:
Why does this initiative affect these imbeciles so much? :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

The ridiculous thing is, if it was their club they'd be applauding it.

God the ****ing morons that infect this site.
 
Just moved all the coffee talk here guys.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Despair said:
THE TAN - TENOUTTATEN - TIGERS ONLY

Ha. Not so funny now is it idiot?
Click to expand...

The Prosecutor said:
In honour of Groupie_, who tried so valiantly to delete his own post after his stupidity was outed here, I present to you the post he deleted...

Cult supporters already providing many lulz in the dreamtime preview thread


As bad as we are, we're still better than these wannabe's. Smash 'em Dons.
Click to expand...


They will kick <60 points because they are terrible and we will force their hilarious backline to kick the footy.
Click to expand...


Our defenders will monster their forwards. I don't see how they'll score tbh.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
Click to expand...

In light of who we are playing this week, I thought I'd re-quote these brilliant pieces of self-ownage by Richmond supporters
 
Caro trying to tell Lloyd that she's not copping that he said that AS A PLAYER, HE COULDN'T SEE THE BALL when playing down one end of Etihad with the roof open. Just amazing.

This following on from her getting right behind Jescinta Campbell's defending Buddy after he suffered the heinous crime of being booed for stabbing his old club firmly between the shoulder blades. But Tania can't defend her husband despite his reputation being destroyed, eh?

She is a joke.
 
How the hell would Caro know if Lloyd could see the pill or not?

She'd actually have to attend the ground to have some idea. We know that just doesn't happen.
 
BomberTime said:
Oh no she attended the game...but admitted to leaving by half time.

The first lady of footballo_O
Click to expand...

Definitely touched a nerve Lloydy re Caro attending a game at Etihad.
 
The Dustbin said:
Definitely touched a nerve Lloydy re Caro attending a game at Etihad.
Click to expand...

On Footy Assified’s Good Call Bad Call the first statement is that “Football girlfriends should be seen and not heard”.
It arose as a result of Jesinta Campbell’s comments about Lance Franklin being booed at the Hawthorn game.
She says it is a bad call, totally sexist call. “ … she’s got every right to talk about what Buddy’s upset by..”.
Unless, of course, you are Tania Hird speaking to the 7.30 Report and then you are apparently just a brainless subservient mouthpiece for husband James eh Caro?
Hopeless hypocritically obsessed ###################.
PS Towards the end she says it is a sexist question. One day she might understand the segment puts statements and propositions up – not questions. And that a question can’t be sexist. A statement can be; a proposition can be; a comment can be but not a question. So much for the prestige of Walkley Awards.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top