As much as a warrior he has been, I look at our list and form and can't see him coming back in.
Shiels has taken his role, and Langford beginning the same apprenticeship that Shiels has had. For balance purposes is Sewells inclusion going to make us a better team? Langford would be the obvious one to go but he has been very impressive, is obviously a talent and needs games put into him. Sending Langford back to box hill will hurt the team in the long run, and I dont think Sewell can improve this team. We also need to get games into Anderson and he would be another one fighting for his spot.
From memory I think Sewell is contracted until 2015, so is Sewells job for the rest of his career a nicely paid development role with the younger players at Box Hill or does he have more to give?
From memory,
Shiels has taken his role, and Langford beginning the same apprenticeship that Shiels has had. For balance purposes is Sewells inclusion going to make us a better team? Langford would be the obvious one to go but he has been very impressive, is obviously a talent and needs games put into him. Sending Langford back to box hill will hurt the team in the long run, and I dont think Sewell can improve this team. We also need to get games into Anderson and he would be another one fighting for his spot.
From memory I think Sewell is contracted until 2015, so is Sewells job for the rest of his career a nicely paid development role with the younger players at Box Hill or does he have more to give?
From memory,