- Moderator
- #1
Sydney v North Melbourne - #AFLSwansNorth
Friday 19 September at 7:50pm
ANZ Stadium
Friday 19 September at 7:50pm
ANZ Stadium
Last edited:
Unofficial Preview Early Thoughts: Preliminary Final - Sydney vs North Melbourne
- Thread starter robbieando
- Start date
- Tagged users None
- Status
- Thread starter
- Moderator
- #3
But AFL is say it will be ANZ Stadium, so we await the make up of the NRL Finals
I am feeling confident about this game as I think we can comfortably beat Geelong, North Melbourne or Essendon especially with the extra week break. A spot in the grand final is ours to lose.
In terms of ins and outs if Malceski is unable to play it is a blow for us but I would go with
Out
Malceski
In
Mitchell
Put Mitchell in the middle and move McVeigh into the halfback position.
In terms of ins and outs if Malceski is unable to play it is a blow for us but I would go with
Out
Malceski
In
Mitchell
Put Mitchell in the middle and move McVeigh into the halfback position.
MarkP
That guy
Not worried about playing at ANZ per se. Our record sans the Pies is freat. And finals are really good.
Just much rather it at the SCG particularly if it is to be Geelong.
And to be fair the ground was fine for play today or at least it was immaterial to the result and not noticeable.
And no changes except for Mal obviously so
Out Mal
In Mitchell who would be sub.
Just much rather it at the SCG particularly if it is to be Geelong.
And to be fair the ground was fine for play today or at least it was immaterial to the result and not noticeable.
And no changes except for Mal obviously so
Out Mal
In Mitchell who would be sub.
- Dec 17, 2003
- 16,797
- 9,823
- AFL Club
- Sydney
- Other Teams
- Glasgow Rangers, Liverpool, Storm.
No point moaning about how we need to address our I50 entries, it's been an issue all year. Were there any goals today that were the result of someone leading to the ball?
- Thread starter
- Moderator
- #7
I would go
In: Biggs
Out: Malceski (inj)
Pretty much like for like and it allows Biggs to be used on a small forward against a team that has a surplus of quick small forwards such as a Hawthorn
In: Biggs
Out: Malceski (inj)
Pretty much like for like and it allows Biggs to be used on a small forward against a team that has a surplus of quick small forwards such as a Hawthorn
The King!
Chosen One
It does. On paper we have the much easier side of the draw. Odds are Hawthorn will have to play either Fremantle or Port Adelaide to get into the grand final. They may still win but it is not certain and hopefully either Fremantle or Port will really really push them hard.
Swan Dive
Team Captain
- Sep 10, 2012
- 467
- 172
- AFL Club
- Sydney
There's been far worse at the SCG over the years.
Swan Dive
Team Captain
- Sep 10, 2012
- 467
- 172
- AFL Club
- Sydney
It was not an easy game this afternoon. It reminded me a bit of the PF in '06 when they came over, because that was a real contest as well. If they win their semi, they certainly won't lack motivation against the Hawks.
The King!
Chosen One
Theres one hard team and its hawthorn
MarkP
That guy
One harder team and that's us
scaryness
Premium Platinum
- Oct 19, 2008
- 14,849
- 23,291
- AFL Club
- Sydney
- Other Teams
- Trail Blazers / Cowboys
Pretty easy change.
Biggs in
Mal ou
Biggs in
Mal ou
The King!
Chosen One
Bet mal plays
If not
In biggs mitchell
Out malceski reid
If not
In biggs mitchell
Out malceski reid
scaryness
Premium Platinum
- Oct 19, 2008
- 14,849
- 23,291
- AFL Club
- Sydney
- Other Teams
- Trail Blazers / Cowboys
Yeah good call on Reid.
Mitchell much more valuable than Reid.
He is only averaging 8 touches a game the last 5 games. Kicked only 3 goals too.
Mitchell much more valuable than Reid.
He is only averaging 8 touches a game the last 5 games. Kicked only 3 goals too.
The King!
Chosen One
Plus tippett rucking now
Unless reid goes back or heaven forbid they want to drop goodes id ditch reid, i know they wont but i think we structure better with one less tall and reid is not doing enough.
Goodes defensive efforts can be non existent and he can be poor but he still has moments, reid rarely does
Again though if he goes back reid could stay
Just my view and it wont happen
Unless reid goes back or heaven forbid they want to drop goodes id ditch reid, i know they wont but i think we structure better with one less tall and reid is not doing enough.
Goodes defensive efforts can be non existent and he can be poor but he still has moments, reid rarely does
Again though if he goes back reid could stay
Just my view and it wont happen
doona
SMFC
AFL's deal with stadium Australia. no one likes it but..................
Hawks will blame COLA for not playing Friday night
PVF
Call Me?
Does anyone know how bad Malceski's injury is yet?
PVF
Call Me?
I didn't see it happen so did it look bad? I heard he was walking around pretty freely afterwards so I assumed like Kennedy's it was just for precaution.
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
