NUFC Tiger
Brownlow Medallist
- Apr 25, 2011
- 18,678
- 16,987
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- NUFC, Socceroos, FGR, NewcastleJets
EPL Matchday 5
- Thread starter SM
- Start date
- Tagged users None
SM
Bigfooty Legend
- Thread starter
- #27
Just imagine what happens if you score an early goal too (not out of the realms of possibility when it took all of 30 seconds for Palace to score and Soton 6 minutes)...
In the 5th minute you could be 5-0 down...
EDIT: Awkward moment when we only have 5 league wins for 2014 as well...
(But 10 if you count the FA Cup and Europa League)
Last edited:
NUFC Tiger
Brownlow Medallist
- Apr 25, 2011
- 18,678
- 16,987
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- NUFC, Socceroos, FGR, NewcastleJets
In the 5th minute you could be 5-0 down...
EDIT: Awkward moment when we only have 5 league wins for 2014 as well...
(But 10 if you count the FA Cup and Europa League)
Ha - that could be relegation form too SM, maybe looking to join us in the championship
If I recall correctly, when we went down, Hull stayed up by a single point that season. Another interesting link between our clubs...
SM
Bigfooty Legend
- Thread starter
- #29
Ha - that could be relegation form too SM, maybe looking to join us in the championship
If I recall correctly, when we went down, Hull stayed up by a single point that season. Another interesting link between our clubs...
Haha was a bit tongue in cheek because end of last season we were much more focussed on the FA Cup since we were essentially safe.
Yep, it felt like we basically stayed up at your expense, so the two clubs seem to have a few links in these situations.
Yes because only the one game involving Hull matter, the other games are completely irrelevant
?
Are you doing your "I'll pretend I am blind and make s**t up" routine again?
SM
Bigfooty Legend
- Thread starter
- #34
Oh gawd why did I even bother replying to you.
Transfer window just shut. Surely the way they line up in the first game they've played with their squad fully assembled is a better idea of how they're going to be playing going forward than the one or two times you've glanced at one of their games earlier in the season before they addressed the holes in their squad?
Playing two strikers up top was definitely just a tactic they wanted to use against us and will never ever use again. Yep you're right.
You seem incapable of understanding that teams can change their style when they bring new players in.
Transfer window just shut. Surely the way they line up in the first game they've played with their squad fully assembled is a better idea of how they're going to be playing going forward than the one or two times you've glanced at one of their games earlier in the season before they addressed the holes in their squad?
Playing two strikers up top was definitely just a tactic they wanted to use against us and will never ever use again. Yep you're right.
You seem incapable of understanding that teams can change their style when they bring new players in.
You bothered to talk some imaginary s**t first, so you farted and blame it on the dog, good on ya
How has the transfer window suddenly come into this? You said I never saw them play, when I clearly have. You're trying to highlight the one game to prove your point, yet I have seen them more than you.
Besides, you're the one who harped on about Hull playing like Liverpool last season, you practically have no idea about styles of football, so why do you even try to talk about it? Hull's bumrush route 1 football was "entertaining" to you, so I wouldn't be surprised if you somehow classed Big Sam's usual stuff (and really it hasn't been any different this season) as "entertaining"
Besides, I said they'll battle and be direct, how is it have anything to do with entertainment? Do you know what battle and direct mean?
How has "battle and be direct" have anything to do with one or two up front? What have you been smoking?
SM
Bigfooty Legend
- Thread starter
- #36
nice assumption.The fact you think Hull play route 1 means that your opinion on our style of play has no weight.
It really has. Especially in their last two games where Sam has had them playing it along the ground and employed an attacking diamond formation against us which allowed their forwards to flourish. In fact, they've scored just as many goals as your entertaining Liverpool side.
I do, and not sure where I made any comment about entertainment?
Wtf have you been smoking? You're just rambling nonsensically as always.
Says the one who has made nothing but assumptions, are you kaiserchief in disguise?
It's not that I think they do, they do, that's just exactly how it is. But you classed that style of football as similar to how Liverpool played last season, you are practically tone deaf when it comes to styles of play
Yes the same Big Sam who has complained very soon after the Hull game that they've gotta play different and tighten up the defense, but ignore that and just harp on about some s**t that suits your own bias. And btw they were clearly physical and direct against Spurs and Palace, but they're not Hull so they don't count,, I guess
Btw you were the same bloke that said Stoke doesn't hoof it anymore, right? Which is a load of s**t to begin with coz Stoke still does it when it suits them, they just change it up. So you are basically wrong almost all the time when it comes to how teams play, but you sure love to talk about it the most, coz you just love being wrong!
? Learn to read, you went to school didn't ya? I hope you did
Rodgers has to earn his money for this game, he's made a few wrong decisions this season, things haven't worked the past two games, defense is leaky and attack is static.
Yes ignore the part where I criticised our own attack, you love behaving like a selective whingy little bitch, don't ya? Like that time when you made s**t up about Remy being better than Costa when no one's said any of that.
You cited the Hull West Ham game being entertaining as evidence that West Ham is whatever it is that you're trying to claim they are.........
That is the most hypocritical statement to ever be posted on here, and that's quite something
So you're the one who nitpicked one part and made a big deal about it, but now claim you aren't interested? You are as schizophrenic as ever
Besides, most of the stupidest arguments always revolve around you sprouting some dumb s**t about football, so get some self awareness first, you'll need that in life
- Sep 18, 2014
- 22,036
- 19,896
- AFL Club
- Geelong
- Other Teams
- Man United, San Antonio Spurs
Cooldude, you gotta learn to just stop replying.
People quote my posts, say silly things, I respond. Don't see anything wrong with that
People like SM needs to learn to stop saying crazy things
- Sep 18, 2014
- 22,036
- 19,896
- AFL Club
- Geelong
- Other Teams
- Man United, San Antonio Spurs
Fair enough, just seems like you're always having big disagreements with other people on here, on a daily basis haha
Not me, that's SM, that's the guy that thinks just because people said Remy scored the best goal out of the 4 against Swansea = people saying Remy is a better player htan Costa
http://www.espnfc.com/arsenal/story...-with-fans-not-to-make-mesut-ozil-a-scapegoat
Fine, they'll scapegoat you instead
- Oct 7, 2002
- 15,867
- 16,291
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
I'll be at St James Park tomorrow, I'll report back on the atmosphere.
Kind of hoping we lose too. Pardew has it tough with that ******* owner limiting his potential but he has lost the players, it's as clear as day.
Kind of hoping we lose too. Pardew has it tough with that ******* owner limiting his potential but he has lost the players, it's as clear as day.
Hope you have your bedsheet ready.
Hammers away... depends on what sort of dynamo we can unleash. Would love to see Sterling at his best, terrorising the Hammers' defence whilst Hendo sprints forward into danger zones.
- Sep 10, 2012
- 6,492
- 3,087
- AFL Club
- St Kilda
- Other Teams
- Al-Nassr FC
Lol @ Ozil. Now his own manager has to come out and defend him publicly.
Flop
Flop
- Apr 2, 2000
- 74,848
- 25,038
- AFL Club
- West Coast
- Other Teams
- Liverpool, Chicago Bulls.
Need to beat West Ham. We simply cant lose three of our first 5. Plus if City do the business then we can move back to just 3 points behind Chelsea.
- Dec 22, 2009
- 62,716
- 36,761
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- Matildas/Socceroos/LFC/MVFC/RCStrasbourg
apollo_creed you must be a happy man. Chelsea & Villa occupying top two spots on the ladder
wrong way around though mateapollo_creed you must be a happy man. Chelsea & Villa occupying top two spots on the ladder
