Autopsy Essendon v Hawthorn

Remove this Banner Ad

Agree, very simple. The tribunal (twice) said that there was no evidence that EFC players were using PEDS.
The Heidelberg Papers clearly identified the majority of your star players where hop heads.

If you THINK..EFC players weren't injecting illegal substances.. your a child and you don't understand the wider implications of not having Essendon play footy this year. There are guilty people walking around in society all day everyday. You know why..either they werern't caught in the act or the people who could have given evidence haven't come forward. Grow up and stop polluting our boards with dribble.
 
Agree, very simple. The tribunal (twice) said that there was no evidence that EFC players were using PEDS.
The Heidelberg Papers clearly identified the majority of your star players where hop heads.
It will be a shame when your other accounts gets suspended as well.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Agree, very simple. The tribunal (twice) said that there was no evidence that EFC players were using PEDS.
The Heidelberg Papers clearly identified the majority of your star players where hop heads.
Admittedly I don't follow it closely but I did read the verdict and they never said there was no evidence. It was "an insufficient level of evidence for a guilty verdict". That's not "innocent", that's not "not guilty", that's "pretty much everything points to you being guilty but there's just not quite enough to prove it conclusively without any doubt".
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top