- Jul 13, 2015
- 36,516
- 40,697
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
Pretty much all of them.
But you're the one trying to be "mr greater good" so you're happy to lose your own club then?
So the competition is better off by losing a highly profitable club which is not only self-sufficient but actually chips in over $1m a year in equalisation payments?
And which pulls big crowds at games and on TV.
You seem to subscribe to a special kind of Socialism where no-one pays - like Greece.
So if we get rid of Hawthorn and a couple of other rich clubs, who funds your basketcase of a club?