- Sep 18, 2013
- 17,752
- 11,820
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
Does this include employees in mumbia and manilla?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Richmond v Melbourne - 7:25PM Wed
Squiggle tips Demons at 77% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
I have been a victim of domestic violence and random violence. Domestic violence affected me significantly more than being bashed by three guys. The injuries I received from the d/v were negligible, but to have the person I loved physically assault me, having to call the police and genuinely fearing for my safety in my own house was devastating.
but to have the person I loved physically assault me, having to call the police and genuinely fearing for my safety in my own house was devastating.
But so is cancer as compared to the flu or losing a child compared to the passing away of a friend or ... these things don't get a special category of leave.I have been a victim of domestic violence and random violence. Domestic violence affected me significantly more than being bashed by three guys. The injuries I received from the d/v were negligible, but to have the person I loved physically assault me, having to call the police and genuinely fearing for my safety in my own house was devastating.
HEY, don't you white knight...erm..white maiden me, the maschonazis will be on to you.Some people can't/won't understand that.
I'm sorry you experienced that
Just heard a headline on Ch10 news that Telstra are introducing a new policy where Domestic Violence victims that are employees of Telstra will be given an extra 10 days of leave per year.
Does anyone have more details? Is it reliant on a conviction or only on an allegation?
Is it fair? Is it just like getting additional leave for bereavements or pregnancy?
Will it have any unintended consequences? E.g. false accusations to access the new benefits
I think you will find that most enterprise agreements provide for bereavement leave for when an employee loses a family member, 99 per cent sure it is in the NES. Don't know of any that provide for special leave for losing a friend. A lot certainly contain provisions for special leave that can be requested in the event of contracting an illness like cancer, so I am not sure what your point is?But so is cancer as compared to the flu or losing a child compared to the passing away of a friend or ... these things don't get a special category of leave.
The reason for this leave isn't because of its effect on the individual. It is for a political outcome, or in this specific case, to engender corporate goodwill for the benefit of Telstra.
Point is there are degrees. A grandparent or aunt is not as devastating as a child. I know someone who took the day off for a mate dying and their manager let them. People will struggle to say no.I think you will find that most enterprise agreements provide for bereavement leave for when an employee loses a family member, 99 per cent sure it is in the NES. Don't know of any that provide for special leave for losing a friend. A lot certainly contain provisions for special leave that can be requested in the event of contracting an illness like cancer, so I am not sure what your point is?
These stats are always rubbish - I'd wager that if you added up all the studies that found the cost bad things do to an economy, we'd be 10 times richer if they didn't exist. It's economic fantasy.This may play a part: Two out of three women who report violence by a current partner are in paid employment and violence against women and children costs the economy $13.6 billion a year.
http://www.afr.com/p/national/telstra_offers_domestic_violence_IJ2kVTtJIzp3TRMs2Z1d9I
I would back Access Economics on this.These stats are always rubbish - I'd wager that if you added up all the studies that found the cost bad things do to an economy, we'd be 10 times richer if they didn't exist. It's economic fantasy.
I wouldn't. These economic studies routinely fudge the numbers.I would back Access Economics on this.
Okay, you know better than them, play on.I wouldn't. These economic studies routinely fudge the numbers.
If you don't think economic studies can be manipulated then you have rocks in your head.Okay, you know better than them, play on.
Your spelling has improved, well done.If you don't think economic studies can be manipulated then you have rocks in your head.
If anyone is genuinely interested in understanding why there is a move from employers to include domestic violence leave clauses in enterprise agreements, I would recommend reading the Access Economics report which can be found here https://www.dss.gov.au/sites/defaul...2012/cost_of_dv_to_australian_economy_i_1.pdf
Those that froth at the mouth in a tesseract like manner, 'play on'.
I was thinking that sounded like a bullshit stat if I ever seen one.These stats are always rubbish - I'd wager that if you added up all the studies that found the cost bad things do to an economy, we'd be 10 times richer if they didn't exist. It's economic fantasy.
I have been a victim of domestic violence and random violence. Domestic violence affected me significantly more than being bashed by three guys. The injuries I received from the d/v were negligible, but to have the person I loved physically assault me, having to call the police and genuinely fearing for my safety in my own house was devastating.
Why not? If the situation requires a person(of either gender, although old Lester's numbers above suggest more women are likely to be DV victims) to attend medical appointments and counseling etc, it seems to be a supportive and reasonable thing for an employer to do. And yep, should be the case for other situations too, although one would expect that victims of 'general assault' etc are already given as much leave as they require for counseling, legal appointments. It won't stop the incidents occurring but helps in the aftermath and surely that is a good thing.Point is there are degrees. A grandparent or aunt is not as devastating as a child. I know someone who took the day off for a mate dying and their manager let them. People will struggle to say no.
There are some things in life which are unavoidable. Domestic violence isn't one of those things, and its not something you tackle via workplace entitlements.
These stats are always rubbish - I'd wager that if you added up all the studies that found the cost bad things do to an economy, we'd be 10 times richer if they didn't exist. It's economic fantasy.
Why?Why not? If the situation requires a person(of either gender, although old Lester's numbers above suggest more women are likely to be DV victims) to attend medical appointments and counseling etc, it seems to be a supportive and reasonable thing for an employer to do. And yep, should be the case for other situations too, although one would expect that victims of 'general assault' etc are already given as much leave as they require for counseling, legal appointments. It won't stop the incidents occurring but helps in the aftermath and surely that is a good thing.
Why?
Why not rape leave?
Do you really believe that horrible things that society should aim to remove be enshrined as workplace entitlements?yeah. Employees are going to go to their boss and say I need to take leave for rape. I bet you that this is not going to be taken up, And if it is so what? The day I am thinking someone is getting a better benefit than me because they need to take leave due to domestic violence,.... well that's a pretty self absorbed position to take.
I wouldn't. These economic studies routinely fudge the numbers.
Why not? If the situation requires a person(of either gender, although old Lester's numbers above suggest more women are likely to be DV victims) to attend medical appointments and counseling etc, it seems to be a supportive and reasonable thing for an employer to do. And yep, should be the case for other situations too, although one would expect that victims of 'general assault' etc are already given as much leave as they require for counseling, legal appointments. It won't stop the incidents occurring but helps in the aftermath and surely that is a good thing.
Do you really believe that horrible things that society should aim to remove be enshrined as workplace entitlements?