"Remember when I let in that escaped lunatic because he was dressed like Santa Claus? Well YOU have a gambling problem!"
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Richmond v Melbourne - 7:25PM Wed
Squiggle tips Demons at 77% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
"Remember when I let in that escaped lunatic because he was dressed like Santa Claus? Well YOU have a gambling problem!"
As an aside, does anyone know if clubs/AFL have mandatory financial planning sessions with each player? I've never heard anything along these lines, and I would be very surprised if the clubs at least didn't organise for each player to sit down with a professional and chat about their dosh.
The NFL does this now as part of their Rookie symposium before each season starts. Goes over financial management, family, trusts, funds etc. When you consider the socio-economic background and education of a lot of the NFL players - it has become an essential part of the NFL looking after itself and outs employees.
Clearly not fully effective but at least they provide it as service.
They also have the NFL concierge service. One number to call - anytime, anywhere NFL players can call a town car / limo to come get them and drive them home in the event they are drunk. It just takes time clearly for the ride to arrive. NFL's attempt to counter DUI. And they still don't use it.
But they try. AFL can learn a lot here.
GO Catters
As an aside, does anyone know if clubs/AFL have mandatory financial planning sessions with each player? I've never heard anything along these lines, and I would be very surprised if the clubs at least didn't organise for each player to sit down with a professional and chat about their dosh.
The NFL ban all forms of gambling by players and officials."But in the NFL they do this" example 3848473929
"But in the NFL they do this" example 3848473929
There are 2 problems here.
One is the amount of disposable income footballers have and the other is the "dead time" they have when not training or playing.
If you look at the prevalence of illicit drugs and gambling, it seems the players are in many cases throwing away whatever they get and not investing in their futures.
Compare this to the 1980's.
Footballers worked in full-time jobs and trained 2 nights a week. Partied on Saturday nights after playing (oh and many Pleasant Sunday mornings too).
The use of drugs and gambling wasn't as prevalent. Sure there were still punters (Crackers Keenan and Jim Buckley 2 noted ones). But, because they didn't have so much "dead time" the problems weren't as bad.
And that's just to us.I think it has more to do with the promotion of betting agencies and the simplicity of gambling.
It's just so easy to gamble.
Why has gambling issues randomly been brought up by the media again? It's been a big issue for a long time.
Two ex Collingwood players who play for interstate clubs that are big time punters get looked after like royalty with Williams Hills main guy Gerry Welsh
It was interesting to hear that goose Radar Maher handle a call this morning that questioned SEN lamenting the plight of gambling addicted footballers whilst being so far up the bookies' arses they've disappeared.
Nobody cares whilst the $$$ are flying about like confetti. It is that simple.
I heard this call and was disgusted with how the entire team just blew the guy off. Even challenged him to provide evidence that advertising and promoting of gambling incessantly has any link at all to problem gambling. Utter ******s.
Possibly because this is a football forum, not a horse racing forum.I also find it interesting that there is such a big outrage at how gambling is linked with AFL especially with the coverage its given in the media, but that outrage doesn't seem to exist with the horse racing industry over the Spring Carnival. That sport is completely based around gambling
Used to see Luke Hodge drop plenty at the Cas, would act like a total fool too, while Mitchel sat there rolling his eyes back....
There are 2 problems here.
One is the amount of disposable income footballers have and the other is the "dead time" they have when not training or playing.
If you look at the prevalence of illicit drugs and gambling, it seems the players are in many cases throwing away whatever they get and not investing in their futures.
Compare this to the 1980's.
Footballers worked in full-time jobs and trained 2 nights a week. Partied on Saturday nights after playing (oh and many Pleasant Sunday mornings too).
The use of drugs and gambling wasn't as prevalent. Sure there were still punters (Crackers Keenan and Jim Buckley 2 noted ones). But, because they didn't have so much "dead time" the problems weren't as bad.
I reckon the gambling is much worse. Try watching or listening to the preview of a game without crossing to Johnny Dickhead at X betting agency for an update on the latest odds.The amount of gambling advertising is ridiculous and makes it hard for the AFL to make any stance against it without being massive hypocrites.
Same with alcohol.
It was more of a general comment than one directed at BF. It was more thinking about some of the outrage that occurred when the Tom Waterhouse ads were all over AFL and NRL and it took the outcry to get it stopped inplay (as you said above). The media itself was up in arms over it. But then a few months later the Spring Racing Carnival comes around and odds are plastered every where. Many of the same people who were outraged were then at the races taking part.Possibly because this is a football forum, not a horse racing forum.
Plus AFL is marketed to children and families a hell of a lot more than horse racing. Not comparable IMO.