I was referring to Joel not Scott. Stokes played only a handful of games in the second half of the season and many of them sub. He played most of that 14 in the first half of the season. I agree Blicavs is an unknown (I'm the Blicavs hater if anyone has forgotten) but they will definately play him as a inside mid at the start now we have Stanley and smith for the ruck.Stokes played 14 games last year. Also played most of the second half of the season ahead of younger players who could have gained invaluable exposure at his expense (don't get me started ) so why wasn't he in the team anymore?
Scott Selwood is a while away. I've said this on numerous times already, he'll be a setback story one after another. I honestly do not expect him to be fully match fit until at least the midway mark of the year so we can't really count on him being ahead of Horlin-Smith for round one.
Blicavs is also unknown as a midfielder. Remember, we now have Zac Smith who is a ruckman first and foremost. There should be absolutely no need to experiment with Blicavs or Stanley as the no.1 & no.2 rucks. We should only have two giants in the middle of the ground at any one time. If we have all of Stanley, Blicavs and Smith, we simply won't be able to compete when the ball gets on the outside. I think Blicavs plays a much more defensive orientated role. Kind of like what we saw from him in the first part of the season before he was thrown back into the midfield on a full time basis due to Stanley & Clark's calf/foot injuries.