Hmm but at the same time why give picks away when any bloke out of contract can walk to the club.
Not every player you want is out of contract. Paying huge money to a player like Scully . No , not for mine.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hmm but at the same time why give picks away when any bloke out of contract can walk to the club.
I mean they could have made an offer to many clubs using some of those picks.They had that many of them. I could imagine what Geelong would have said if they had offered 3 picks in top 15 for Chapman or whoever. They threw a heap of money , huge money at a kid...not even a scarce type , a young mid who has proven to be just a good ordinary best 22 player.
Oh I agree 100% it was a bad move. But they made the best of the situation and by god did it generate a lot of publicity for GWSNot every player you want is out of contract. Paying huge money to a player like Scully . No , not for mine.
Oh I agree 100% it was a bad move. But they made the best of the situation and by god did it generate a lot of publicity for GWS
The Dees also did well out of it. They got to move on a spud in Scully for ******* Hogan!
Whilst I agree he has largely been a bust for them... he also went there as a kid.... and this year the games I've seen he is starting to look a good player. So it may work out well for them in the endI disagree on Scully. They could have gotten better if they had not been so greedy. Im not sure he has ever been BOG for them has he? Still it looks like its not a defining choice.
Obviously I do not know all they approached. I do not believe they approached all willing to go with Scully money.There were plenty of better players than Chapman who were out of contract and could just walk to the club if they could convince them to come, they would have talked to any half decent player who was out of contract and they had two years to do it(which would probably be around 80% of all players) suggests to me that they had trouble convincing individuals to join there club.
Id agree with that.. Good player that is no better than quite a few others they have. Worthy of best 22.Whilst I agree he has largely been a bust for them... he also went there as a kid.... and this year the games I've seen he is starting to look a good player. So it may work out well for them in the end
Our recent successful history is not to pay overs. We shouldn't for Henderson (though he would fill the bill for Enright wonderfully) or any other player. Messiah complexes we don't need.Not every player you want is out of contract. Paying huge money to a player like Scully . No , not for mine.
Is it realistic to think we could land both Dangerfield AND S.Selwood though? Ill be pleasantly surprised if we could grab one let alone both. If you are on the money and we do get both, then trading our first rounder would be perfectly acceptable.