Geelong v. Bulldogs @ Simonds Stadium

Remove this Banner Ad

Horrible decision. The first vision that they showed, showed that, IF, Lonergan touched it then the whole ball wasn't yet over the line. Problem was that nothing they had, showed Lonergan actually touching it.

Awful.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

How hard is the concept of ' inconclusive' for these idiots?

I can't remember which game it was but there was one earlier in the year where it was clearly a poster, the flight of the ball changed direction after it hit the post, yet even after the review they kept it as a goal. For this one I think they've gone the other way and assumed the funky little bounce was actually caused by a touch by Lonergan when there was no evidence of it happening.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top