One report I read was self funded retirees are fair and square in the rifle sights. I would have thought they would be big coalition supporters
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There is very little avoidance and the company doesn't pay it. So both the ato/companies like it.Corporate Tax Accountants/consutants
There is very little avoidance and the company doesn't pay it. So both the ato/companies like it.
The reason it is good high wealth individuals , visitor and self funded retirees will pay it
Consultants. big six or whatever they are these days were the cheer squad for the GST, maybe also because instead of simplifying things it made them harder, thus more tax consulting needed
There is very little avoidance and the company doesn't pay it. So both the ato/companies like it.
The cash economy has been signicantly shrunk by amongst other things the gstVery little avoidance of the GST?
http://smh.com.au/nsw/cashinhand-economy-is-costing-public-billions-20121020-27y5t.html
No not reallyConsultants. big six or whatever they are these days were the cheer squad for the GST, maybe also because instead of simplifying things it made them harder, thus more tax consulting needed
You must not have had any work carried out on your home.
I can't remember the last time a tradesman sent me an invoice or accepted cheques.
Ah Promised. by politicians
You must not have had any work carried out on your home.
I can't remember the last time a tradesman sent me an invoice or accepted cheques.
"Writing exclusively for Fairfax Media, he has warned the tax is inherently regressive, provides no incentive for behavioural change, would reward foreign shareholders if it was used to fund a lower company tax rate, and worst of all, would inevitably lead to a 20 cents-in-the-dollar GST rate in line with much of Europe, before long."no winners...losers are us, and what makes anyone think that it will stop at 15%?
Keating chimed in.
http://www.theage.com.au/federal-po...-hospital-funding-crisis-20160202-gmjutl.html
Keating gets its. It is what I have been saying all along.
Don't think I have heard or read anywhere where the federal government has stated that any increase will go back to the states.He didn't always. Those who agree with him now should be thanking their lucky stars he was overruled in 1985.
This whole debate comes down to one problem - the states have to spend but they are very restricted in how they can raise revenue. So you get suggestions like those from Premiers Baird and Weatherall, because they won't bear the political brunt of what they propose.
He didn't always. Those who agree with him now should be thanking their lucky stars he was overruled in 1985.
This whole debate comes down to one problem - the states have to spend but they are very restricted in how they can raise revenue. So you get suggestions like those from Premiers Baird and Weatherall, because they won't bear the political brunt of what they propose.
Has anyone read that Keating goes the no tax increase / hard fiscal right route and bashes the left as well. No suggestions solutions either.no winners...losers are us, and what makes anyone think that it will stop at 15%?
Keating chimed in.
http://www.theage.com.au/federal-po...-hospital-funding-crisis-20160202-gmjutl.html
That was the agreementDon't think I have heard or read anywhere where the federal government has stated that any increase will go back to the states.
Victoria has never gotten more GST back than it generated.Andrews