MaddAdam
Cancelled
10k Posts
Bay 13: Vintage Bay
Podcaster
North Melbourne - North 2012 Player Sponsor
North Melbourne - North 2011 Player Sponsor
North Melbourne - North 2010 Player Sponsor
North Melbourne - North 2009 Player Sponsor
I am honestly mystified as to how Carlton have got themselves to the situation where they are approaching the AFL "trigger point" for formal intervention in their administration like has happened at various levels at other clubs.
Its a reality that what defines "big" and "small" clubs has radically changed in the last decade.
It is also a reality that what defines off field success, and how it is achieved, has dramatically changed.
But how does a club with significant pokies - and didn't they get a sweetheart deal for more off Mathieson recently - have such financial problems?
And more interestingly, what approach does Carlton take from here? They, as Lo Giudice acknowledged, done the rich white knight thing with Pratt. It doesn't appear to have worked.
Where's their market niche? The Dogs have the west. North have the inner city community club angle. What's Carlton's USP?
There is also the fact that if , as Trigg suggested, poor onfield results have whacked the bottom line, then they have a few more years of that coming with the rebuild.
They will also face issues on the value of their sponsorships given they have been banished from Friday nights.
I have said before the financial reality of the comp means that unless you are Collingwood or Essendon, or have your own ground like Geelong, a Victorian team needs a successful secondary market to be financially stable.
Where is Carlton's?
I suspect we are witnessing a tectonic shift in the Victorian footy landscape.
It has been obvious for a while now that Hawthorn is a true power club in every sense. Geelong are firmly established one rung below the truly big boys, but a huge improvement on where they were.
It is amazing to think that not that long ago Carlton tried to buy another club in North.
Yet even a perennial financial struggler like North is now far better placed off field than the Blues.
What way forward at Princes Park? Their options seem to be very, very limited.
Its a reality that what defines "big" and "small" clubs has radically changed in the last decade.
It is also a reality that what defines off field success, and how it is achieved, has dramatically changed.
But how does a club with significant pokies - and didn't they get a sweetheart deal for more off Mathieson recently - have such financial problems?
And more interestingly, what approach does Carlton take from here? They, as Lo Giudice acknowledged, done the rich white knight thing with Pratt. It doesn't appear to have worked.
Where's their market niche? The Dogs have the west. North have the inner city community club angle. What's Carlton's USP?
There is also the fact that if , as Trigg suggested, poor onfield results have whacked the bottom line, then they have a few more years of that coming with the rebuild.
They will also face issues on the value of their sponsorships given they have been banished from Friday nights.
I have said before the financial reality of the comp means that unless you are Collingwood or Essendon, or have your own ground like Geelong, a Victorian team needs a successful secondary market to be financially stable.
Where is Carlton's?
I suspect we are witnessing a tectonic shift in the Victorian footy landscape.
It has been obvious for a while now that Hawthorn is a true power club in every sense. Geelong are firmly established one rung below the truly big boys, but a huge improvement on where they were.
It is amazing to think that not that long ago Carlton tried to buy another club in North.
Yet even a perennial financial struggler like North is now far better placed off field than the Blues.
What way forward at Princes Park? Their options seem to be very, very limited.