How does Capitalism help stupid people in a globalised world?

Remove this Banner Ad

Genius does economics. Lefty warrior had no answer

Go to 3 min mark - pans excessive consumerism canard.


 

Log in to remove this ad.

de Pfeffel even has the best haircut. When cats like Gerard Vaughn at NGV confect to develop the artistic copulance, Bojo has the pefectly organic mid aged paunch instead of attempting to JPS bad faith the chairman of MOMA corpulance. Bojo just has it.

#monbiotEmperorsClothes
 
Maybe we shoot people who use hashtags.
but Sartre gives you an out if you are playing along with the joke. you can neutralise it.

like if you say upfront wrt hypocrisy, i do this, but you cant. well it aint really hypocrisy, you have conceded your position, but you can still give the sound advice of cognition.
 
All covered back in the day BC.

"It is not from the benevolence of the butcher, the brewer, or the baker that we expect our dinner, but from their regard to their own interest."

“People of the same trade seldom meet together, even for merriment and diversion, but the conversation ends in a conspiracy against the public, or in some contrivance to raise prices”.

As Confucius says - Man holding brick #genius.
but positive externalities. ie. Alan Turing.
 
Last edited:
People should not have to leave their people for jobs. Someone is making money off EVERY community, the people making money should be FROM that community.

And then you would complain that someone is raking in all the money. The evil rich.
 
People should not have to leave their people for jobs. Someone is making money off EVERY community, the people making money should be FROM that community.

People should not expect to be fed byf society when they choose to live in a uneconomic location.
People should not have a sense of entitlement because they are too lazy to go where the jobs are.
 
Remember, for every buisiness that succeeds, there is one that fails.

Er no. It's not binary.

.
They did a ******* great job brainwashing the working class into believing it was Captialism that gave them a higher standard of living and not Socialism.

Quoted for the lols. Even bigger lol from the OECD who have become the ABC on steroids re economics. Who else could call the communist takeover of Eastern Europe egalitarian.

Paris (AFP) - The gap between the haves and the have-nots globally is now at the same level as in the 1820s, the OECD said Thursday, warning it was one of the most "worrying" developments over the past 200 years.

The results showed that income inequality dropped sharply in the middle of the 20th century -- which the OECD put down to what it called an "egalitarian revolution", notably with the rise of Communism in Eastern Europe -- but then spiked more recently.
 
Last edited:
Brewer is positive. He makes cash you get beer.

"To be rich is glorious"

same bloke who gave us black cat quote re catching the mouse.
no, thats economic surplus.

Turing gets nothing for his computer. And some extreme libertarians are of the philosophy intellectual patents are invalid and not true property (rights), under their interpretation of liberty.

economic surplus is just a banal trade, and one achieves implicit value/surplus.

positive externality is the inverse of negative externality, value that is apportioned to populace thru no exchange of economic value. axiomatic inheritance.
 
Last edited:

(Log in to remove this ad.)

but Sartre gives you an out if you are playing along with the joke. you can neutralise it.

like if you say upfront wrt hypocrisy, i do this, but you cant. well it aint really hypocrisy, you have conceded your position, but you can still give the sound advice of cognition.
I'm still dealing with being 'Followed'
 
Er no. It's not binary.



Quoted for the lols. Even bigger lol from the OECD who have become the ABC on steroids re economics. Who else could call the communist takeover of Eastern Europe egalitarian.

Paris (AFP) - The gap between the haves and the have-nots globally is now at the same level as in the 1820s, the OECD said Thursday, warning it was one of the most "worrying" developments over the past 200 years.

The results showed that income inequality dropped sharply in the middle of the 20th century -- which the OECD put down to what it called an "egalitarian revolution", notably with the rise of Communism in Eastern Europe -- but then spiked more recently.

#FIN

Review meta Schumpeter column

#Fairfax
#butGINAbuysNEWsLtdwhenRupeDies
 
Disagree with definition. False argument. See Cippola and laws of human stupidity (economics is damn boring but that is a cracking read).

Things don't have to be shared equally to be of benefit.

Poverty measures are a joke. If I am $10 better off and you are $1 better off then you are NOT poorer.
not everyone can put Daniel Vettori's long hop over long on like KP genius, most can barely hit a boundary
#trevorChappell
 
People should not expect to be fed byf society when they choose to live in a uneconomic location.
People should not have a sense of entitlement because they are too lazy to go where the jobs are.

Economics > People is your argument?

Yeah well that's a s**t argument.
 
FFS, even the top job in the country involves relocating. Some people need to grow a pair and not be a mummy's boy all their life.
 
Economics > People is your argument?

Yeah well that's a s**t argument.
mebbe in the round up, economics serves the people, now, even the rationalists conflate that as people should serve the economics, but they dont appreciate the true end is even austrians' philosophy has it serving people. not people serving a philosophy of economics. but the disciples can conflate too
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top