Hurley, Pears and Ryder Vs Goldstein, Hansen and Grima

[Joshen]

Never seen the point in bumping threads from 3 years ago.

Except the lolworthy ones where posters judge way prematurely e.g. Gary Ablett vs Colin Garland.

 

[Zach Package]

weird poll, neither? I'd take goldstein and maybe ryder, the rest i wouldn't want the pies to go near

it's a shitfight basically, not a lot more.

Goldy is probably a marginally better ruck man, but ryder is much better going forward, so that's much of a muchness.

Pears and Grima are perfectly equal parts 'meh' and the Hurley v Hansen comparison is pretty crap to be perfectly honest

 

[benbanjo]

it's a shitfight basically, not a lot more.

Goldy is probably a marginally better ruck man, but ryder is much better going forward, so that's much of a muchness.

Pears and Grima are perfectly equal parts 'meh' and the Hurley v Hansen comparison is pretty crap to be perfectly honest

so in other words
Goldy>Ryder
Grima>Pears
Hansen>Hurley....

 

[eth-dog]

so in other words
Goldy=Ryder
Grima=Pears
Hansen=Hurley....

No, he's saying this.

 

[thetradesman]

Very much equal.

 

[Zach Package]

so in other words
Goldy>Ryder
Grima>Pears
Hansen>Hurley....

you want my actual opinion?

If i was given the option to take one of all 3 pairs, i'd take Ryder and Hurley and then flip a coin to decide between Pears and Grima

 

[Joshen]

While my opinion above doesn't change I'm amazed at how many people still underrate Hansen.