I agree. My point is that Danger would know exactly what he is worth at all times.
Don't disgaree, but also note that not electing to be traded doesn't mean he's staying
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I agree. My point is that Danger would know exactly what he is worth at all times.
Did he? I thought was only the swans trying to him
Don't disgaree, but also note that not electing to be traded doesn't mean he's staying
Which 5% are?95% of us on here aren't tex
I'll keep that close to my chest, if your asking your clearly not one of themWhich 5% are?
I'm just worried that my cover's blown!I'll keep that close to my chest, if your asking your clearly not one of them
IN TEX WE TRUST95% of us on here aren't tex
You are right to an extent.... But the difference is that Sloane has moved his parents over here and Tex is just Tex..... He has grown as a bloke, a leader and loves the AFC and SA.I disagree that Sloane and Walker are different in any way to Danger, based on what they have said in the media.
They are either signed or unsigned. Anything else doesn't matter. Gunston was giving every indication he would sign.
So you're suggesting Melbourne would pay Danger an extra $3.9M (($1.4 x 6) - ($0.9 x 5)) to save picks 2 & 3??But those won't be the dollars. Take melbourne for example:
It's gonna cost us 2&3 to get you, we'll pay you 900k over 5 if you ask for a trade now.
If you hang on, see out the year, save us the picks (and make us stronger for when you arrive), you do the hard yards and we'll pay you 1.4m over 6
The premium is for not costing them anything.
If danger was about the money, he'd refuse to be traded.
So you're suggesting Melbourne would pay Danger an extra $3.9M (($1.4 x 6) - ($0.9 x 5)) to save picks 2 & 3??
I agree somewhat with the principle that clubs will trade off the two forms of consideration - what it costs to acquire the player and what they have to pay him - but to nowhere near that extent.
How many Mojitos have you had this morning?
The speculation will be crazy next season. I just hope we win the games we should win all the time and make finals. That should quiet down the media a little tiny bit.
I just wish we didn't have to go through a season of footy having to discuss whether danger will stay or go. It all gets depressing and the season hasn't even started.
I just wish we didn't have to go through a season of footy having to discuss whether danger will stay or go. It all gets depressing and the season hasn't even started.
He's very well aware of the damage all this speculation will cause. And this is why I have some concerns about how much he loves the club if he is happy to put us all through this.
I've quoted it before (Dangerfield from May 2012):
"We've built strong bonds as a group of players coming through together at this club - and that is how you win premierships by keeping your core group together, that's how you build winning teams."
Before Dangerfield's three-year contract was on its way to AFL House yesterday morning, Crows football operations chief Phil Harper opened negotiations with Tippett's Brisbane-based management.
"We've told Kurt's management we would like to start talks and they've told us they would like to get talking," said Harper. "Hopefully, we can get something done by the end of June."
Tippett, 25, will recognise Dangerfield's point that Adelaide's on-field progress does not need the distractions of contract speculation.
This prompted Dangerfield to advance his talks from his previously preferred position of leaving negotiation until the end of the season.
"It's good to have it out of the way - we can now focus on team rather than individuals," said Dangerfield.
"I can now focus on just playing on footy.
"At the start of the year, I was leaning to (an end-of-season negotiation).
"But the speculation, the hype that generates has become a negative on the group.
"To get it out of the way and allow the club to focus on winning games of footy - rather than fielding questions about players' contracts - is about thinking for the club."
I've quoted it before (Dangerfield from May 2012):
"We've built strong bonds as a group of players coming through together at this club - and that is how you win premierships by keeping your core group together, that's how you build winning teams."
Before Dangerfield's three-year contract was on its way to AFL House yesterday morning, Crows football operations chief Phil Harper opened negotiations with Tippett's Brisbane-based management.
"We've told Kurt's management we would like to start talks and they've told us they would like to get talking," said Harper. "Hopefully, we can get something done by the end of June."
Tippett, 25, will recognise Dangerfield's point that Adelaide's on-field progress does not need the distractions of contract speculation.
This prompted Dangerfield to advance his talks from his previously preferred position of leaving negotiation until the end of the season.
"It's good to have it out of the way - we can now focus on team rather than individuals," said Dangerfield.
"I can now focus on just playing on footy.
"At the start of the year, I was leaning to (an end-of-season negotiation).
"But the speculation, the hype that generates has become a negative on the group.
"To get it out of the way and allow the club to focus on winning games of footy - rather than fielding questions about players' contracts - is about thinking for the club."
What do you reckon? Me I think he's been sounded out already and he won't sign anything. His right. If he does 2 yrs I don't care. FA. I'm with the club over one player so won't be too upset. If he stays or goes I will praise and admire him for his service. Money aside, who really wins?Anyone not terrified by this post is not paying attention
I'm not going to hold it against him though. Back in May 2012 he was full of beans and was certain he wanted to stay. Obviously he never thought these words might come back to haunt him. He was just full of the moment & exhuberant enthusiasm.
but there is no getting around the fact, that for whatever reason, he doesn't feel the same way at the moment. Those words from back then just don't reflect what he is saying right now.
We'll have to see if there was a clue in this or not.
Why would you be terrified by fact. The clue is clarkson.Anyone not terrified by this post is not paying attention
I'm not going to hold it against him though. Back in May 2012 he was full of beans and was certain he wanted to stay. Obviously he never thought these words might come back to haunt him. He was just full of the moment & exhuberant enthusiasm.
but there is no getting around the fact, that for whatever reason, he doesn't feel the same way at the moment. Those words from back then just don't reflect what he is saying right now.
We'll have to see if there was a clue in this or not.
I guess thats what Im trying to find out....
I follow a lot of European soccer and they seem to deal with it, I just wonder if he was honest and said how it is, how would we deal with it!
Shows a supporter base has creditView attachment 90217
This was the Dortmund BVB fans response to Götze signing with Bayern.. This was held up whilst he was still playing for Dortmund. Basically translates to, the pursuit of money shows his real heart.. Piss off Götze. brilliant
Can you imagine the uproar from the AFL if any supporter base tried this. Rather sad to be honest.Shows a supporter base has credit
He hasn't put us through anything yet - start saying that if he holds off contract talks or hasn't signed by the third quarter of the season.He's very well aware of the damage all this speculation will cause. And this is why I have some concerns about how much he loves the club if he is happy to put us all through this.