In launching the failed legal action, Hird wrote in section 42 of his affidavit: “I believe that if show-cause notices are issued to current or former Essendon players by ASADA, this would give rise to immeasurable and irremediable damage to my reputation, my earning capacity as an AFL coach and my business interests external to Essendon and the AFL.”
I'm glad the "players" got a brief mention. But it doesn't address how it affects the players, more about how it all affects James' ego and pecuniary interests.
How exactly does he think it affects the players under his watch? The players he was/is responsible for?
Given the "get-out" clause for breach of contract/duty of care, would potential draftees have reason to be concerned about being drafted to essendon. Would they have the right to refuse?
I'm glad the "players" got a brief mention. But it doesn't address how it affects the players, more about how it all affects James' ego and pecuniary interests.
How exactly does he think it affects the players under his watch? The players he was/is responsible for?
Given the "get-out" clause for breach of contract/duty of care, would potential draftees have reason to be concerned about being drafted to essendon. Would they have the right to refuse?