HBF
Flying Scotsman
- Sep 24, 2002
- 156,160
- 100,963
- AFL Club
- Carlton
I hope this is right.Carlise is not going Carlton at all
The club did say they weren't going to chase big names and rebuild through the draft.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I hope this is right.Carlise is not going Carlton at all
Lets be creative - Why not swap first and second round picks 3 for 6 and 21 for 24 - And maybe something else thrown in during the trading period.
Carlise is not going Carlton at all
It's not the late 90's anymore. Carlton are nowhere near a "big 4" club.This is another reason why the fixture doesn't help the lesser clubs get bigger. He will only play for the big 4 clubs in Melbourne due to the blockbuster games and prime time fixtures. Carlton, Collingwood and Richmond the only possibilities but with the tigers resigning Rance I doubt they will bid. Pies chasing Treloar so that leaves blues. Carlton is the only club he has met with personally and that was in the first 4 weeks of the season.
It's not the late 90's anymore. Carlton are nowhere near a "big 4" club.
But what will you do with yourself nowBeauty , good to know .
Let's all move on .
Tell that to the AFL and Channel 7
He'll move on to Adam Treloar.But what will you do with yourself now
Didn't syd get Kurt for SFA?Current rumours say that he's leaning towards going, and the Bulldogs are the main party. So the Carlton focus being entirely based on one Journo's comments might be putting the cart before the horse.
On the ban, even if they get a 2 year penalty they'll barely miss more than one season. Half more than Tippett (who had a confirmed ban). The first 6 months of suspended sentence counts, so any ban would be only 1.5 years maximum (from that point). If the decision is in October (say) then any player banned would miss one season, and be available the following April. And that's the maximum penalty, they could easily have a lesser penalty if found guilty given their circumstances. A one year ban would have them available April 2015 after subtracting the suspended sentence period. So the odds are that in reality they will miss at most one year, or just one-preseason, with a good chance they'll receive no penalty (after all, found not guilty once already). Whereas Tippett who had a certain half-year ban found it didn't impact his price at all.
I wish they would.Tell that to the AFL and Channel 7
I agree with this. The traditional "Big 4" is now a legend. I don't think it exists in the 21st Century. If you asked me to list a "Big 4" for right now I would put:It's not the late 90's anymore. Carlton are nowhere near a "big 4" club.
Interesting to see Jake back this week to play against the Bulldogs. Time to sell himself??
How did he perform?Surely last years performance will still be in the memory bank of all dogs fans.
How did he perform?
Surely last years performance will still be in the memory bank of all dogs fans.
And he wants to be a defenderWow, decent bag of 8 goals!
Interesting to see Jake back this week to play against the Bulldogs. Time to sell himself??
Why?