I think the list is:
Melbourne
Hawthorn
Adelaide
Collingwood
Carlton
Gold Coast
Richmond
St Kilda
Doubt we'd take him. Club said we won't be active in free agency for a couple of years.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think the list is:
Melbourne
Hawthorn
Adelaide
Collingwood
Carlton
Gold Coast
Richmond
St Kilda
Thomas got band 1 compo for 5 years x 625k, so that's a guide as to what clubs will need to offer.The alternative is to throw yourself on the tender mercies of the AFL, and hope that they give band 1 compensation ... which is unlikely unless someone does pay him in the 800k range.
Suck it up, if we lose one of the best KPD's in the game we deserve something pretty damn good.
As if you wouldn't ask for 800k. Is he worth it? No way, but Melbourne have to pay someone.
You'd pay him that figure to add him to White and Lynch who robbed Collingwood blind with three and two year deals.Carlton will still go for him. Desperately need KPP and times are getting even more desperate.
If Carlton pay $800k for Frawley, then Andrew McKay and Greg Swann can clean out their desks.
He'd barely even be worth half of that. A big pass from us.
Suck it up, if we lose one of the best KPD's in the game we deserve something pretty damn good.
They've been doing a great job so far.
You'd pay him that figure to add him to White and Lynch who robbed Collingwood blind with three and two year deals.
No we paid that figure to Cloke. Carlton should have hit him with a 5 year @ 1M/year deal and tried to shake him loose. But you preferred to pay Daisy $700k for 4 years instead, good player but not KPP by any means.
If you don't think Carlton will go after Frawley to help your structure you're even deeper in la la land than anyone thought.
You paid that figure to Cloke and gave three years to White thanks to Carlton showing interest. That's free agency. Plus a deal with Channel Nine.No we paid that figure to Cloke. Carlton should have hit him with a 5 year @ 1M/year deal and tried to shake him loose. But you preferred to pay Daisy $700k for 4 years instead, good player but not KPP by any means.
If you don't think Carlton will go after Frawley to help your structure you're even deeper in la la land than anyone thought.
Of course we'll look at Frawley, but not at $800k. No way on gods green earth is he worth that sort of coin.
Jury is still out on Thomas - happy to give him to the second half of the year to see how he goes.
He has missed a heap of footy.
You paid that figure to Cloke and gave three years to White thanks to Carlton showing interest. That's free agency. Plus a deal with Channel Nine.
Thomas didn't get 700K. Will earn his money more than White and Lynch.
People are missing the point if they think Frawley and Cloke would have made a difference in round three. Even Roughead struggled against Essendon the previous week. Problem was attitude and workrate, rather than having elite KPP and more talent.
Carlton had 29 i50s on Sunday night. A key forward would not have made any difference to the outcome of the match, or even the margin. You're kidding yourself if you think our biggest problem is a lack of KPPs. We struggle to get the ball to the KPPs we have.
Once again, I never said KPPs weren't a problem. I just said it wasn't our biggest problem. Please read my posts properly if you're going to try call me clueless, makes you look like a fool.I'd assume you'd realise you wouldn't just have been recruiting them just for last Sunday nights game.
When you have many problems work on the biggest ones first and if you don't think that's quality KPP you're even more clueless than I though you were.
Once again, I never said KPPs weren't a problem. I just said it wasn't our biggest problem. Please read my posts properly if you're going to try call me clueless, makes you look like a fool.
What would be the point of having Cloke at full forward if our midfield is too slow and lazy to get the ball to him. I used Sunday night as an example. Fact is, our midfield struggles on a weekly basis.
It is your biggest problem. They are hard to find, midfielders not quite so much. 2 big KPP in FA and draft your guts out on midfielders, they're easier to find and develop quicker. It's not rocket science.
So because they're hard to find they're our biggest problem?
Most identify a club's biggest problem as an area that is struggling the most & something that needs fixing ASAP in order to see improvement. But not you. Good to know.
Couldn't get any more ASAP than 2 ready to go KPP within a couple if years.
And that's where we differ. We need players who will be in their prime in 4 or 5 years. Not players who will be ready to nearly retire. It's the age of Frawley which makes him an unsuitable match for us. If we're going for the full rebuild (which I hope we are) then getting a player who will be 26 next year, wants 800k & will cost us a compo pick (if Gibbs leaves) is counterproductive.
Rubbish. If you could've/did land Cloke and Frawley and drafted 3 'quality' mids in the last 2 years and this year you'd be a totally different side in 2 years time.
Assuming you can get someone to get them all to play with some heart that is of course.
It astounds me how you are not an AFL list manager already.
How would propose we afford Cloke on close to 1 mil per year and now Frawley on 800?