In his 2nd year he got 3 games in a Premiership side, whereas JJ couldn't get a game in a 10th-on-the-ladder side.
Good point, though personally think that's an inditement on our MC rather than Jansen.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
In his 2nd year he got 3 games in a Premiership side, whereas JJ couldn't get a game in a 10th-on-the-ladder side.
Just curious as to why you guys are asking for close to your money back on Jansen? Mid 30s pick who hasn't played a game in his first two years and is uncontracted, surely a late pick does it (e.g. pick in the 50s or later)?
For comparison someone like Nathan Freeman, a top 10 pick and uncontracted who hasn't played a game is likely to net Collingwood a pick in the late 20s.
Is there a less obvious reason you're expecting something decent for a trade? E.g. maybe we will give you something decent as you let Christensen come to us without any sort of a fight trade wise.
What is the Lions likely to give for him? A 3rd round pick probably? He would have little trade currency and not worth trading for a 3rd rounder IMO.
Don't think Brisbane could stomach a player with the word stay in his name leaving them.Very keen on Dan McStay. Would be perfect for our future. Far better prospect that Henderson.
How could we structure a deal to get him?
Obviously we can't.
Anyway, my wish list.
Don't think Brisbane could stomach a player with the word stay in his name leaving them.
McLeave
Very keen on Dan McStay. Would be perfect for our future. Far better prospect that Henderson.
How could we structure a deal to get him?
Obviously we can't.
Anyway, my wish list.
The "Mc" bit sounds Irish or Scottish and is probably code for "opposite of".Don't think Brisbane could stomach a player with the word stay in his name leaving them.
That's not my last name by the way
McStay the one that got away. Tall defender needs ignored again, but the guy's a switchman as well and can go forward, Wells missed a good one there.
We know that it is McLve.
but we got Rivers who is now retired and we are going to get Henderson who will be solid for four years at best.
We don't need to look at drafting in anymore young key defenders or forwards. That's not how you create a winning formula.
It's all about now and not 2018 & beyond.
Wait I'm confused.
Re Henderson - At BEST he will be solid for about 6 years, but likely the 4 year mark.
Just on the last bit, I thought you wanted us to build a premiership team by drafting players & stop trying to fill gaps for a few years with Free Agents & Trades?...But now you're saying it's all about the here & now which either means an incredible draft pick who is ready to step in from Day 1 or way more likely bringing recruits in from other clubs. Which would you prefer? Perhaps a mixture of both?
They were very keen on him, but went for DarcyMcStay the one that got away. Tall defender needs ignored again, but the guy's a switchman as well and can go forward, Wells missed a good one there.
There is another word for people like that.I got a lot of love to give!
Wait I'm confused.
Re Henderson - At BEST he will be solid for about 6 years, but likely the 4 year mark.
There is another word for people like that.
But to uphold my weekly check-in...are you still doing OK mate?
how did hendo go in carltons b and f?
Not in top 10.Uh not sure to be honest aha can you tell me?
I like a mixture. To go down the aggressive rebuild now when we've been doing it differently for the last 3 years wouldn't be good for Selwood and Hawkins. Go down that path now and we might as well trade them.Wait I'm confused.
Re Henderson - At BEST he will be solid for about 6 years, but likely the 4 year mark.
Just on the last bit, I thought you wanted us to build a premiership team by drafting players & stop trying to fill gaps for a few years with Free Agents & Trades?...But now you're saying it's all about the here & now which either means an incredible draft pick who is ready to step in from Day 1 or way more likely bringing recruits in from other clubs. Which would you prefer? Perhaps a mixture of both?
One of the guys on Trade Radio sort of echoed what others have said here. That Geelong would've liked to keep Jansen, good on the inside, but they would question how well he would be able to spread from a contest.