- Moderator
- #351
Was okay. Not great, not bad. Pratt was good, BDH was good, the giant ass water dino was good.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Richmond v Melbourne - 7:25PM Wed
Squiggle tips Demons at 77% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
Went and saw it yesterday, like many others I didn't have great expectations but enjoyed it more than I thought I would.
The typical blockbuster by numbers plot and characters were predictable but it had some good action scenes, especially when the pterodactyls and other dinos started running amok and attacking people. Would have liked to have seen a few more gory deaths but I guess they are limited to what they can do without giving it an R rating and losing the family audience.
Would give it a 5 or 6 out of 10 overall, not great but good enough for what it is.
It was always going to rake in big dollars whether it was good or bad just on having the Jurassic name alone.
There weren't any Pterodactyl's in the movie?
Sent from my SM-G900I using Tapatalk
I want to see a Prattasarus hybrid. A wise cracking dinosaur. The Guardians of the Jurassics.
All the four year olds in the cinema seemed to like it too. It must've been aimed at people on their level.Must have only watched 2 movies in your life
Sorta how I feel with the fast and furious movies.All the four year olds in the cinema seemed to like it too. It must've been aimed at people on their level.
It seems that's the way that blockbuster movies are going. Dumb and full of implausible action sequences.Sorta how I feel with the fast and furious movies.
It seems that's the way that blockbuster movies are going. Dumb and full of implausible action sequences.
You can't argue with success so there's only going to be more of them in the future. Fortunately the marvel/Disney films have yet to go down that road. Hopefully it stays that way with the new Star Wars film.