Knightmare
Brownlow Medallist
- Sep 22, 2010
- 19,533
- 19,542
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
- Other Teams
- Chicago Bulls
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #2,926
The kind of situation where a lack of exposure actually increases his appeal.
Round 1 last year he was exceptional. However, it was his marking in the forward 50 and not his ruck work that made him stand out for mind.
As he is being "considered" or "touted" as a pick 40 - rookie it is testament to the lack of key talls in the draft.
The ratings of Michael Apeness also suggest this.
As a forward for the Ranges I preferred Boyd (obviously) and O'Sullivan pre-injury over Apeness's form (also preferred Roth but he's not a key forward).
I am perplexed as to why Apeness would be considered a 1st round option. I think it would be preferable to look in the 3rd round for rucks from state leagues (well, not the VFL).
I'm only interested in Boyd firstly then Nankervis and M.Harvey as those key forward/ruck types. The others wouldn't be so highly rated any other year.
Knightmare, when will your final edit be of your mock draft?
I'll likely shuffle the order around tomorrow night.
I'm reading that Crouch may slide to Adelaide's pick 23. I'm not sure how I feel about this! I'm not sure he is the type we need.
From what the experts are saying Adelaide aren't looking at Crouch all that closely with others preferred interestingly.