Knightmare
Brownlow Medallist
- Sep 22, 2010
- 19,533
- 19,542
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
- Other Teams
- Chicago Bulls
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #2,751
How much of a chance is hugh beasely of getting drafted this year? Suggestions that he did not rebound or intercept aswell as some injury issues explains why he didn't getpicked up last year, how much has he improved and possible strengths and weaknesses?
Beasley is a late/rookie chance but probably against the odds.
He's been one of and arguably the best key defender in the TAC Cup. He plays a terrific two way game. Beats his opponent almost every week but balances that well with an offensive game as a capable rebounder.
The issue is just more that he is only 190cm, which most will look at and dismiss immediately given he is a true key defender.
De Goey or Duggan for the Tigers? Both would suit us very well.
It will be an interesting one. I'm a De Goey man as he can win it inside but also go forward and take a mark. Duggan is probably the slightly more highly rated as one of the most highly regarded people in this draft and I expect he might be slightly favoured over De Goey as the more productive player.
Hi KM, what do you know about Duom Dawam?
Do you think hes any chance at getting drafted? Or is the rookie list his best chance?
Duom Dawan is a super athletic ruckman but very light bodied at 75kg. He's very raw but he's someone I want to see come back to the TAC Cup next year and see if he can improve. In the ruck contest he jumps and guys jump into him and he just recoils backward - as he doesn't have adequate strength at this stage. Similarly around the ground he doesn't find it. So at this stage I'd class it as highly unlikely that Dawam is drafted this year as an outside rookie chance at best.
Knightmare - what is your view on this years draft crop from a depth perspective?
With the dogs looking like they may have 2 picks inside the top 10 and 2-3 picks inside the 20's - how much quality can they expect to get with those later picks?
should they be trying to package say 26+27 for pick 20 or something of the like?
Picks 26 and 27 are good picks. The top 30, maybe top 40 with correct talent identification are pretty good and pretty even. I wouldn't bother moving up. There will be some good value guys available in the mid-late 20s.