Thanks for those words of wisdom turkey..
Traded Lachie Henderson [traded to Geelong for 2016 first round pick]
- Thread starter Rodriguez Mendoza
- Start date
- Tagged users None
If Geelong have to give up a heap for Danger, for example 1st and next year's 2nd round what would you guys accept? Any players?
- Nov 14, 2012
- 12,164
- 19,684
- AFL Club
- Carlton
None they'd want to give up.
Maybe second rounder then .
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
- Nov 14, 2012
- 12,164
- 19,684
- AFL Club
- Carlton
nope...
I reckon we'll get next year's first. Geelong are an honourable bunch to deal with
Can see Geelong's first and 2nd for this year heading off though which might make them a bit anxty.
BTW, if they trade next year's 2nd it stops them from trading next year's first.
I reckon we'll get next year's first. Geelong are an honourable bunch to deal with
Can see Geelong's first and 2nd for this year heading off though which might make them a bit anxty.
BTW, if they trade next year's 2nd it stops them from trading next year's first.
I think Crows will take this years first and next year's 2nd, because its a deeper draft.
NTRabbit
Brownlow Medallist
If we take next year's 2nd, then Carlton can't have next year's 1st - can't future trade a 1st and 2nd round pick from the same draft.
Lock away next years first for henderson before making the bid on Dangerfield and then Adelaide have to decide between risking 14 for 9 + 29 or letting him go.
- Aug 22, 2009
- 24,445
- 28,080
- AFL Club
- West Coast
Or lock away Dangerfield and then Carlton can only be offered second rounders and fringe players.
The "if we trade away our picks then we can get other players cheaper" strategy works both ways.
- Aug 22, 2009
- 24,445
- 28,080
- AFL Club
- West Coast
They could get our 2016 second rounder as part of a Selwood trade (or side trade that we agree to for not matching).
- Aug 22, 2009
- 24,445
- 28,080
- AFL Club
- West Coast
You talking about Danger or Henderson?
Lock away dangerfield and you are resigning to losing both first round picks and a 2nd rounder at minimum.
Lock away henderson and you lose next years 1st & when adelaide decide against the risk keep this years first as well as both their 2nd rounders, one of which can be used on smith.
Tell me which one benefits geelong more?
- Aug 22, 2009
- 24,445
- 28,080
- AFL Club
- West Coast
Crows get more in a trade (than compo) regardless of what happens. They match regardless. So your scenario isn't really relevant, although I agree it's great for Blues and Cats.
I just think it's risky to prioritise Henderson over Dangerfield.
It seems like some people are suggesting that the crows will take whatever they can get, whereas the blues need a first rounder. Doesn't make sense.
Danger's difference in value as compared to Henderson is more than a single second rounder.
- Aug 22, 2009
- 24,445
- 28,080
- AFL Club
- West Coast
Yeah maybe they are. But my point was that Adelaide are just as likely to accept a low ball as Carlton.
- Nov 14, 2012
- 12,164
- 19,684
- AFL Club
- Carlton
That would be logical, and if the rules allowed it, the better option.
- Aug 22, 2009
- 24,445
- 28,080
- AFL Club
- West Coast
It will just be a matter of Geelong prioritising who they want. If they get all 4 targets they will be doing very well, but it will require a lowball to get it done. Maybe they just get 3, or maybe they trade someone out.
- Nov 14, 2012
- 12,164
- 19,684
- AFL Club
- Carlton
Yep, coz he's a great judge.
It will if they deal out a second round to you guys. Apparently according to Saints fans, and last week Carlton ones too, he's lost is value because he's out of contract.
Hang on ... What were you posting in the other thread? 2nd round for Carlisle.
