- Thread starter
- #101
Indeed. A few names worth mentioning are Dayne Beams, Rory Sloane, Steven Motlop, Luke Shuey and Stephen Hill.Might have to add more players if the Free Agency minimum qualifying push is successful
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Indeed. A few names worth mentioning are Dayne Beams, Rory Sloane, Steven Motlop, Luke Shuey and Stephen Hill.Might have to add more players if the Free Agency minimum qualifying push is successful
Indeed. A few names worth mentioning are Dayne Beams, Rory Sloane, Steven Motlop, Luke Shuey and Stephen Hill.
Theres still some loyalty in football, Sloane, Danger, Tex are not coming your wayRory Sloane... I'd take him thanks
Any chance Cotchin might look to make a move next season with the way the Tigers are going?
I'm not looking to get him to Alberton, mainly because I don't believe he would want to play in Adelaide. I'm just really curious to see if there will be a big free agent on offer next season and Cotchin would fit the bill.With all due respect your team and ours, I think it would be extremely difficult to lure a non-SA player to our Clubs.
In fact, history states that neither of us have been able to lure a big fish that was successful outside of SA and not bred here especially from a Victorian Club. With all due respect to Carey he was well and truly washed up as a footballer when we got him. IMO and its a late post so no player from the past jumps up towards me, but Betts was a damn good get for the Crows - "A Class" small forward.
He's not coming to SAI'm not looking to get him to Alberton, mainly because I don't believe he would want to play in Adelaide. I'm just really curious to see if there will be a big free agent on offer next season and Cotchin would fit the bill.
I'm not looking to get him to Alberton, mainly because I don't believe he would want to play in Adelaide. I'm just really curious to see if there will be a big free agent on offer next season and Cotchin would fit the bill.
Could you imagine Eddie McGuire? His red head would explode.Sydney will Get dangerfield and cotchin somehow I am calling it now
No they don't own 2 tv stations like little EdSeeing that he is the only presso with Balls not surprising if it did.! #otherclubpressosaregutless.
Did you get your iPad taken awaySydney will Get dangerfield and cotchin somehow I am calling it now
That's great news for Carlton. He will be a club champion within a couple of years. Wanted him at Port. Needs to slot straight into the midfield in 2015Not strictly a Free Agent but Troy Menzel has re-signed at Carlton ...
Theres still some loyalty in football, Sloane, Danger, Tex are not coming your way
I think the inherent logic in your post is exactly why its not true! No doubt over the last 4 years Frawley would be in our top 25%. But the frontloading and signing guys like Vince, Dawes and maybe even Clark and re-signing others seems to have put his 2014 wage under that.Can someone explain to me why James Frawley is an unrestricted free agent?
I can't find anywhere in the AFL Free Agency rules that only the final year of a players multi year deal counts towards ranking a player in the Top 25%, yet it seems to be the accepted wisdom.
If the AFL introduced free agency laws, AFTER he signed a front ended contract that sees him in the bottom 75% in one out of 4 years - then the D's have every right to be upset that he qualifies under a rule that didn't previously exist.
surely his contract should be averaged out, to determine if he is in the Top 25% of earners?
Can someone explain to me why James Frawley is an unrestricted free agent?
I can't find anywhere in the AFL Free Agency rules that only the final year of a players multi year deal counts towards ranking a player in the Top 25%, yet it seems to be the accepted wisdom.
If the AFL introduced free agency laws, AFTER he signed a front ended contract that sees him in the bottom 75% in one out of 4 years - then the D's have every right to be upset that he qualifies under a rule that didn't previously exist.
surely his contract should be averaged out, to determine if he is in the Top 25% of earners?
I don't agree with the decision, but only the final year determine if you are in the top 25% of earners.
http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/james-frawley-can-walk-away-from-demons-20140311-hvhi1.htmlCan you point me to where this is stated anywhere in FA rules available publicly?