Apparently they did find WMDs but because the US itself had supplied the dangerous chemical agents and their delivery systems, it would be a worse look to discover their own weapons.
So they found mobile chemical weapons labs in the back of semi trailers did they?
The whole world (well maybe excluding some people here) know the West supplied Saddam with wmds. The pretext for invading though wasn't those weapons but the allegations that he was making his own. Claims which are now known to be false.
So why 12 years later should we believe their latest claims?
They claimed not long ago Assad used chemical weapons on his own people...only that got swept under the rug quickly after a UN report came out that showed the terrorists were the ones who used a chemical weapon.
But we should believe them still right? Well some people think so. I prefer to think neither side is telling the truth or the whole truth.
Last edited: