RussellEbertHandball
Flick pass expert
And what does he want to happen to Dank?? To provide him with a year of free "supplements" to help Marttie become a lean fighting machine??
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: St Kilda v Western Bulldogs - 7:30PM Thu
Squiggle tips Saints at 51% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
Life is harsh. BF reflects lifeYou are too harsh on the bf posters.
I can see a lot of The GG, Bobby Charlton and Mxett in Hardly.
Having seen him in court, that's not exactly the description I have of him.
Brick shithouse is closer to the mark!
This picture explains a lot.
Imagine if he was marking your essays?! He should be charged over his duty of care. Surely he can stretch that to some legislation taken wholly out of context that calls for life in prison.Can Deakin fire him already? Please? Pretty please with a cherry on top?
According to many posters, I am Hardie.
Or Hankie.
Can't remember which one.
He's been backing - and, in some instances, advising - those on the losing side of the equation throughout this saga. I guess the academic is attempting to salvage some pride.Take out the word brick and you're just about spot on.
Yes, by getting oneself on everybody's ignore list one may start a movement via big footy!!!There are agendas here that defy belief
According to many posters, I am Hardie.
Or Hankie.
Can't remember which one.
This picture explains a lot.
Don't over sell yourself.
Most people here can recognise a budget rate wannabe.
I am amazed he is still employed.If I was studying Law at Deakin University, I'd want my money back.
Horse testicle injections!!!I am amazed he is still employed.
Surely he is in breach of contract for bringing the University intro disrepute. Not only is he a knob - he shows scant understanding of the law. He is both a loose cannon and an idiot driven by some warped anti-government ideology (I think he sees himself as some kind of anti-establishment anarchist of some type) and his obvious duffle coat partisanship. Kind of ironic he has aligned himself with News Corp and Paul Little.
In short he's full of crap.
Clearly the privacy issue with BMcD naming Dank is offset by the public interest component. BM actually had a duty to name Dank. If he didn't and Dank goes off and gets a job for an A League side or something then BM could be done for negligence for not adequately protecting the public from Dank and his horse testicle injections and quackery.
I think Hanke was Hawker something or other on here.Don't over sell yourself.
Most people here can recognise a budget rate wannabe.
I am amazed he is still employed.
Surely he is in breach of contract for bringing the University intro disrepute. Not only is he a knob - he shows scant understanding of the law. He is both a loose cannon and an idiot driven by some warped anti-government ideology (I think he sees himself as some kind of anti-establishment anarchist of some type) and his obvious duffle coat partisanship. Kind of ironic he has aligned himself with News Corp and Paul Little.
In short he's full of crap.
Clearly the privacy issue with BMcD naming Dank is offset by the public interest component. BM actually had a duty to name Dank. If he didn't and Dank goes off and gets a job for an A League side or something then BM could be done for negligence for not adequately protecting the public from Dank and his horse testicle injections and quackery.
Both I think . Danky is open minded. We have to say that about himHorse testicle injections!!!
Is that into the horses testicle or injecting one into a player?
We could have teams winning by a short half head instead of goals!!!
I think Hanke was Hawker something or other on here.
GG you are a poor mans Hardie Im afraid and thats a worry cos Hardie is not completely sane.
Although sometimes I think Hardie is just playing to character and trying to get a profile and sell books. Im not convinced he even believes all his utterances and is just having a bit of a laugh. I kind of hope that is the case anyway.
Is it really possible that a uni lecturer in law would have "scant understanding of the law"?
Re the public interest angle, I think the article addressed it (by the way, I am not sure if it is correct, haven't really looked at it, and despite popular opinion, I'm not this bloke).
Well clearly he knows the law - but some of his interpretations are fairly out there.
Anyway maybe he is having a laugh at our expense. I am open minded to that possibility.
I am not sure but I managed to get 'horse testicles' into a post so I feel my job is done for the nightmate, to date, I have been accused of being 30 different people (yes, I have kept track)
personally, I'd be most pleased if people refrained from name calling, making false accusations about me, etc.
I'm just plain ol' GG
a foundation member of the GWS Giants
a man of independent means offering a bit of an opinion on a board where it is not wanted
what could be more fun than that?