Joke suspension the AFL must be getting nervous Collingwood could miss the finals.
If this were the case surely Chappy would have got a week as well - at least that one could have been justified.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Joke suspension the AFL must be getting nervous Collingwood could miss the finals.
What for missing?If this were the case surely Chappy would have got a week as well - at least that one could have been justified.
What for missing?
For a bloke that looked like he'd been killed, he played out the game alright...It was a cheap shot 50m off the play that left a bloke on the ground. Absolutely it deserved a suspension.
Hates Goddard, loves Chappy?The Goddard suspension is the latest thing proving that the AFL has it out for Essendon
The Goddard suspension is the latest thing proving that the AFL has it out for Essendon
as we all are- at least the MRP are consistently inconsistent!Beams got off the other week but then Goddard and Rocky get done this week.
Robinson gets 2 weeks and then Chapman and Gray get off for exactly the same thing.
I'm a little confused
Much clearer than the Goddard one at the very leastThis was posted on our board. Very noticeable but not a whisper said
Chapman did exactly what Mitch Robinson did the week prior (2 week suspension as a result)
Petrie's contact with the face can only be deemed "unreasonable" or "unnecessary" depending on the outcome of the Lake "direct to tribunal" case. If Lake is done for rough conduct....then surely Petrie's facial contact was entirely reasonable and necessary given he was being choked out.
Look, its simple! The mrp loved St Kilda Goddard, but hates Essendon Goddard, and they hated Geelong Chappy, but love Essendon Chappy. Its all in the latest mrp top secret gazette. Do keep up.Hates Goddard, loves Chappy?
This was posted on our board. Very noticeable but not a whisper said
You cant imagine that the actual MRP panel would watch every minute of every camera angle of every match. Someone has to do it at the AFL but not sure its the MRP's jobThere is an enormous problem in the fact that the MRP only address what gets spoon-fed to them by the AFL, they don't actually review matches themselves, only snippets.
Creates a ludicrous situation.
To allow for clarity and consistency, surely it has to be brought in house by the MRP in some form.You cant imagine that the actual MRP panel would watch every minute of every camera angle of every match. Someone has to do it at the AFL but not sure its the MRP's job
It would be nice. At the same time I wouldn't mind hearing on how they decide on which incidents to look at. Is it just the ones the media spots and highlights? What happens when they miss stuff? Clarity, clarification and consistency would be fantastic...but this is the AFLTo allow for clarity and consistency, surely it has to be brought in house by the MRP in some form.
You cant imagine that the actual MRP panel would watch every minute of every camera angle of every match. Someone has to do it at the AFL but not sure its the MRP's job