PykeDream
Only the Betts
- Sep 2, 2011
- 4,700
- 1,902
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
were carlton even trying?
I guess the fact they lost two games means they weren't.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
were carlton even trying?
You might want to let the umpires know that as one of them paid a free kick for that exact reason during the Port and Carlton game.
100% effort.were carlton even trying?
I guess Carltons season is over just like Essendons
how did tom "the ranga" lynch go? was sad to see him leave the saints
Bullshit. It would have either been paid for a throw or for holding the ball.
were carlton even trying?
15.3.2 Incorrect disposal and Payment of free kick
When the football is in play, a Free Kick shall be awarded against a Player who hands the football to another Player or throws the football.
The umpire said the words "incorrect disposal".
Would likely have been holding the ball then. Incorrect disposal after a tackle when a player has had prior opportunity is holding the ball.
And dude, the free is for a throw. Incorrect disposal, whilst is mentioned in the rules numerous times, is not something that on it's own that a free is paid for. Christ, imagine how many kicks would be paid if every time a player fumbles it or drops it concedes a free kick? The whole bloody game would be free kicks.
We obviously didn't care for the results. Glad to see no injuries come from the games either. Does anyone know who Port and Adelaide were resting for their games?
The amount of times I heard "outside the paint", "he can go for 9" and "coast to coast" made my ears bleed.