- Thread starter
- #901
So we got the best ruckman in the draft!!!!!
King Wrighty!!!
i think Peter Wright was the best Ruckman in the draft
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So we got the best ruckman in the draft!!!!!
King Wrighty!!!
Yep - that nightmare draft said Howe could develop as a midI wouldn't worry about these players nominated positions, they often end up playing elsewhere. Schoenmakers was a CHF, Duryea a half-forward, Hodge a half-forward, but they were moved to different roles in the senior team. This will probably be the case here. Howe looks like he could be a big-bodied midfielder.
sure, but they've actualy had to witness (not imagine) us handing them their arses repeatedly during a 3 flag period of dominance.call me pessimistic but in a few years I can just imagine our midfield getting smashed by Collingwood. They have De goey, Maynard, scharenberg, freeman, crisp, greenwood, seedsman etc against our midget brigade Duryea, hill, whitecross, shiels, woodward, hartung, anderson
More of a forward, isn't he?i think Peter Wright was the best Ruckman in the draft
More of a forward, isn't he?
And he's better than the alternative they were going for at #50 and the other guy they were interested in for the Rookie?Graeme Wright just said he was expecting to take a ruck in the rookie draft, but when Pittonet was available they jumped at pick 50 and took him..........
And he's better than the alternative they were going for at #50 and the other guy they were interested in for the Rookie?
Who knows what's going on at that debacle of a club. Not the first time they've broken the rules.How come Essendon only had 2 picks? Thought it was a compulsory 3 live picks?
We most certainly are looking good for rucks in the short and long term. Very happyThing is ... McEvoy and Ceglar are both young. You would expect our ruck stocks to be catered for until 2018 at least. Even more so given we are supposed to be re-rookie-ing Grimley
i would've loved Neal-Bullen or Blakely at 31, not gonna lie, but Howe was a good pick up although i thought he'd be there for pick 49/50, they jumped early for him maybe? or they heard another club was into him so they went early? who knows...
they got Dan Howe because he is an Elite kick of the ball, he isn't fast or have great endurance but is a great kick
Blakely at 189 not tall enough?Wrighty thinks Dan Howe will be a tall mid at 191cm........
Because they promoted Ambrose with their third pick. Rookie upgrades weren't published in the draft order on the tracker.Who knows what's going on at that debacle of a club. Not the first time they've broken the rules.
Agree with all this. Other sides have to build their premiership side. We already have one that just needs to be added to and improved!Don't get too caught up in this - the hawks use a different selection criteria than other clubs.
We also bake these guys in the development squad and seconds for a couple of years, so don't think in terms of immediate needs. Our next crop of youngsters is:
Woodward
Hartung
O'Rourke
Ceglar
Litherland
Anderson
Sicily
O'Brien
Also add Frawley, Schoenmakers, whitecross as guys who didn't play in the grand final and you'll get a sense of just how far back in the queue picks 31, 49 and 50 are.
We are playing the long game and picking guys on a different basis to fantasy draft pundits.
Remember Litherland? Nobody knew who he was when drafted. A couple of years later and he's playing in the first and is fast, strong and never loses his feet.
Relax guys, we've got this.
*cough cough* Please place your head at the bottom right of my AvatarThis gives us a chance to give Suckers the flick at the end of the year while he still has currency.
well I think blakely has the potential to be nearly as good as lewis. Whereas I think Howe's ceiling is about as good as Stratton is now. Time will tell though, hope im wrongIf you watched the draft, waiting to see who will be taken to replace those three players, then you're doing it wrong.