News Limited vs Labor

Remove this Banner Ad

The layman knows the cops stuffed it up. It is obvious they were given poor instructions and it defies belief that they would go in there all guns blazing for one bloke. A trained specialist would have no problems taking him out with one shot to the head. But no, our guys go in there shooting the place up.
Yep but are you really in any position to make such an assessment at this point? How is it obvious they were given poor instructions and how can you place such trust in the opinion of a layman?
Maybe they stuffed it up, maybe they got the best possible outcome from a tricky situation?
 
The layman knows the cops stuffed it up. It is obvious they were given poor instructions and it defies belief that they would go in there all guns blazing for one bloke. A trained specialist would have no problems taking him out with one shot to the head. But no, our guys go in there shooting the place up.
I have actually met laymen who say this stuff ^. I think the main thing they're ignoring is the fact he said he was ISIS. He didn't act like it, and his history should've suggested he was just looking for attention, but the cops either took that aspect seriously and figured he had explosives (they didn't want to shoot his backpack) or they thought he was a joke (more likely considering his history; their refusal to entertain any of his demands; the use of Police rather than anti-terrorism forces) and that he wouldn't kill anyone. That may well have been true if the hostages didn't force his hand by regularly escaping. Can't blame them for that of course... Except if you want to be a real d**k and imagine that you wouldn't have left the women behind... one of the early escapees did look like the most physically-capable hostages, but the old guy had already run so maybe he expected the bombs to detonate or bullets to start spraying... Point is, we weren't there. Who knows what could have been done.
 
The terrorgraph just went full *.

Complaining of bias against the coward :eek:

For them to even SAY the word bias is an insult to all the morons who support the Murdoch party..ERRRRRR lnp.
Like we're supposed to have forgotten the 6 year hissyfit they threw o_Oo_Oo_Oo_O

And it's not like they've made a mistake , just the usual " treat 75% of the population like they have the intelligence level of a 3rd grader ".......it's just utter cheek.



And that also brings me to the last 7 days of s**t they've pumped out , 2 weeks ago it was all " the Monks a w***er , sack him ".....then we got 7 days of Simon Benson on his knees in front of the coward and licking his lips with glee.
And apparently it's not Tony , it's US :drunk:

( and ISIS.......and dirty musso indos......and dsp recipients.......)


fascist dogs
REMEMBER NUREMBURG !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 

Log in to remove this ad.

This year's Walkley for the journalist with the least self awareness goes to...
B-KO0g4CIAAmsa-.jpg
 
This is one of the funniest things I have seen in ages. :D
He should live stream from his office when he writes these columns, I can just imagine the silly bugger pounding his keyboard with his fists and turning puce. Something like the above would have made compelling viewing.
 
Just finished watching the Bolt Report for some light comedy.
I wonder what he would talk about if your removed the topics of Labor/Green/ABC. One hour of test pattern?
So funny he critised the ABC of interrupting Lib guests/Ministers, yet continually did that the the guest (didn't catch his name), don't think that he got to finish one question. Yet on the other hand, Kroger despite not only interrupting got to finish his response.
Best comedy hour on TV.
 
Just finished watching the Bolt Report for some light comedy.
I wonder what he would talk about if your removed the topics of Labor/Green/ABC. One hour of test pattern?
So funny he critised the ABC of interrupting Lib guests/Ministers, yet continually did that the the guest (didn't catch his name), don't think that he got to finish one question. Yet on the other hand, Kroger despite not only interrupting got to finish his response.
Best comedy hour on TV.

I heard that deadshit Miranda crawled out from the pond to make an appearance.
 
I heard that deadshit Miranda crawled out from the pond to make an appearance.
Yes she was but franly not sure what she said as I zoned out. think I will keep watching (when I can) as I find it quite incredulous it has as serious audience.
He invites people that may have an opposite view just so he can attack them, why do they go on his show?
He looks so uncomfortable on screen, should stick to being a keyboard warrior.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Just finished watching the Bolt Report for some light comedy.
I wonder what he would talk about if your removed the topics of Labor/Green/ABC. One hour of test pattern?
So funny he critised the ABC of interrupting Lib guests/Ministers, yet continually did that the the guest (didn't catch his name), don't think that he got to finish one question. Yet on the other hand, Kroger despite not only interrupting got to finish his response.
Best comedy hour on TV.

I think more lefties watch it than conservatives.

I haven't watched it for a while. The show depends on who are the guests. I'm not sure who he has had on lately but Michael Kroeger is a bore as is Bruce Hawker and Gary Johns. Peter Costello is good value when he comes on. Cassandra Wilkinson talks sense as does Judith Sloan. I've seen Richard Marles and Anthony Albanese on the show. Bolt treats them with kid gloves because he is just happy to get a Labor polly to appear.
 
Bolt's greatness is clearly beyond the undergraduate understanding of many on this forum.
 
Bolt's greatness is clearly beyond the undergraduate understanding of many on this forum.
Bolt's success is that he has tapped into the lower socio-economic groups in society who are on the whole less educated. They relate to his scepticism on global warming because they don't want to change their habits, they agree with his views on ethnic groups and society becoming overly politically correct, so for him to sell his Liberal propaganda is a lot easier for him.

Give the masses what they want to hear and it makes it easy to sell them a lemon.
 
Bolt's success is that he has tapped into the lower socio-economic groups in society who are on the whole less educated. They relate to his scepticism on global warming because they don't want to change their habits, they agree with his views on ethnic groups and society becoming overly politically correct, so for him to sell his Liberal propaganda is a lot easier for him.

Give the masses what they want to hear and it makes it easy to sell them a lemon.

Bolt deals with uncomfortable truths which the Leftist Hive Mind doesn't want discussed, as it exposes various Leftist lies and disasters.
 
I think more lefties watch it than conservatives.

I haven't watched it for a while. The show depends on who are the guests. I'm not sure who he has had on lately but Michael Kroeger is a bore as is Bruce Hawker and Gary Johns. Peter Costello is good value when he comes on. Cassandra Wilkinson talks sense as does Judith Sloan. I've seen Richard Marles and Anthony Albanese on the show. Bolt treats them with kid gloves because he is just happy to get a Labor polly to appear.
Have watched it 3/4 times to date, merely for laughs but if I wanted to watch objective new reporting about what is happening in politics, would give it a miss.
It is funny though.
So over the word 'left', what does it really mean apart from some posters here throwing the word at people they disagree with as an insult.
 
Have watched it 3/4 times to date, merely for laughs but if I wanted to watch objective new reporting about what is happening in politics, would give it a miss.
It is funny though.
So over the word 'left', what does it really mean apart from some posters here throwing the word at people they disagree with as an insult.
A very good point, you can add the word 'racist' to that as well. Most of those who use both words on here haven't got a clue what they mean.
 
A very good point, you can add the word 'racist' to that as well. Most of those who use both words on here haven't got a clue what they mean.
However, 'racist' has a clear meaning but it is often used to describe bigots and intolerance, which you must admit there are some on these forums.
"Left" on the other hand is a nothing word. Perhaps it really means left handed?
 
However, 'racist' has a clear meaning but it is often used to describe bigots and intolerance, which you must admit there are some on these forums.
"Left" on the other hand is a nothing word. Perhaps it really means left handed?
Looks like we agree on both counts. I will have to keep an eye out for those bigots and intolerant bastards.:)
Perhaps we can persuade a certain Mod of this board to cease using the term 'leftist bullshit' given that it's a nothing word.
 
Looks like we agree on both counts. I will have to keep an eye out for those bigots and intolerant bastards.:)
Perhaps we can persuade a certain Mod of this board to cease using the term 'leftist bullshit' given that it's a nothing word.
As soon as you remove your 'No Halal' avatar, then maybe we can discuss. No, scratch that, I have no problem with the Mods on this board.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top