Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So you admit that private school results are based on self-selection. We're making progress.That's crap. Parents on other hand take the rational decision to take their kids out of private school after year 10 if they aren't that bright / going to uni etc. In my experience all that left private schools, left school ie didn't transfer to the state system.
I went to a private high school, I have children. I have friends who have children in private schools. I have investigated schools (private, state, state selective) for my children. I have friends who went to private schools. I live in this country.What is your experience of private schools based on?
Postal code of residence. Not school.Correlation isn't causation. Just because rich people are more likely to go to private schools it does NOT mean that sending a kid from a poorer area to a private school wont have a positive outcome compared to being in the state system.
Regardless if its all about parental income then Catholic schools shouldn't outperform state schools in the manner in which they do.
So you admit that private school results are based on self-selection. We're making progress.
Maybe because private primary schools don't push too many kids out?
Bloody ethnic's again!Some of Sydney's most prestigious private schools have become Anglo-Australian ghettos as the education of high school students across the city is increasingly segregated along ethnic lines.
Do you have school age kids mate?No that is crap. You have no statistical base for your argument, just a hatred of churches. The evidence strongly points out not just to a better education but far more importantly massive overachievement in terms of income over a lifetime. You going to deny that as well?
Below is just another reason for state school underperformance, the large number of students from a non English speaking background. Hardly the teachers fault, they just got screwed at the altar of multiculturalism.
Seriously Chief, I am all for individual choice, if you want to damage the chances of your children getting ahead in life, well that's no concern of mine.
Lol still peddling nonsense from the teachers union.
http://www.smh.com.au/national/education/the-sydney-schools-becoming-anglo-ghettos-20150824-gj69tv.html#ixzz3m5R4gwBr
Some of Sydney's most prestigious private schools have become Anglo-Australian ghettos as the education of high school students across the city is increasingly segregated along ethnic lines.
Do you have school age kids mate?
Verbose way of saying no then, but I'm sure you know better.
Did you read the article you quoted? Or did you just look for a random list of stats to support your deflection?Nope, lots of nieces and nephews in Tas who are though (in any event it is hardly statistically sound to say that because I have kid in school that would make give me some great insight into education, it doesn't constitute a normal population). Some of them would have gone to state schools as I would have but the huge issue is that in Tas, schools are zoned. Some of the state schools are fine but some that draw from different catchment areas are very poor - ie state school closest to where I grew up. The same system operates in the UK. Schooling here is like house prices in Oz, huge topic of conversation because private schools aren't subsidised so trying to get your kid in a good school is a nightmare. They still have selective grammar schools which I think are a great idea. They aren't private (so no church influence Chief, he of unmatched wisdom) but produce outstanding results. They give poor kids the chance to escape the local schools.
Did this make the news in Oz? Graphics show Australia is one of the biggest proponents of school computers.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-34174796
Investing heavily in school computers and classroom technology does not improve pupils' performance, says a global study from the OECD
- Students who use computers very frequently at school get worse results
- Students who use computers moderately at school, such as once or twice a week, have "somewhat better learning outcomes" than students who use computers rarely
- The results show "no appreciable improvements" in reading, mathematics or science in the countries that had invested heavily in information technology
- High achieving school systems such as South Korea and Shanghai in China have lower levels of computer use in school
- Singapore, with only a moderate use of technology in school, is top for digital skills
Simple: abolish religious schools.http://www.smh.com.au/national/education/the-sydney-schools-becoming-anglo-ghettos-20150824-gj69tv.html#ixzz3m5R4gwBr
Some of Sydney's most prestigious private schools have become Anglo-Australian ghettos as the education of high school students across the city is increasingly segregated along ethnic lines.
Simple: abolish religious schools.
Straw man.Nor is the nonsense put out be teachers unions that "private schools expel anyone who isn't doing well academically".
They encourage children not to attend on certain test days. They guide/bully children out of OP track subjects.
You must not have read the part where my teacher friend told me he is the guy they send kids to. He is pretty matter-of-fact about it, and that his school is not the worst for this kind of thing.Lol, Chief you really have lost it. Another "Wilson" moment from you. Plenty of private schools make English, Maths etc compulsory up to grade 10 and encourage it at VCE/HSC etc.
http://www.xyz.net.au/mainstream-media-narrative-vs-much-more-complicated-reality/
Mainstream media narrative: All migrants coming to Europe are fleeing civil war in Syria.
Reality: It is much more complicated. A large majority of them have no identification whatsoever. There is no way to prove they are all from Syria. One report suggests as few as 1 in 5 are from Syria, and video footage shows many are clearly from Africa, not the Middle East. Furthermore, the fact that so many are passing through peaceful countries which are relatively prosperous compared to their own, with the goal of getting to either Germany or England, belies their claim to be “refugees.”
Leadership strains within the 20-strong Nationals party room have intensified with the heir-apparent Barnaby Joyce accused of trying to hurry current leader Warren Truss out the door.
At issue is the highest rank attainable by a Nationals MP, that of Deputy Prime Minister.
It comes as Bill Shorten heads into the Nationals heartland on Saturday to hammer the message that the rural party is split over its leadership, beholden to the Liberals, and can no longer be regarded as the natural representatives of rural and regional Australia.
While Mr Joyce has denied disloyalty, angry pro-Truss Nationals say the man Tony Abbott had described as Australia's best "retail politician" seems to have concluded that his chances of securing the leadership are fading unless the change-over happens soon, meaning before the end of the year.
Some Nationals concede the later Mr Truss leaves it, the more time it allows for a younger alternative to emerge, with names like Michael McCormack and the marathon-running Darren Chester mentioned.
A Truss loyalist said Mr Joyce's working assumption that he would lead the party, and some less-than- subtle manouvreing, had offended neutral Nationals and engendered a new phenomenon, the ABBC or "anyone-but-Barnaby camp".
Those close to Mr Truss, 66, confirm he could decide to step down early next year. But, they stress, he might also decide to stay on.
s**t, they're dropping their standards, I read that even Australia might get a spot on this.