Patrick Dangerfield vs Nat Fyfe?

Better player?

  • Patrick Dangerfield

    Votes: 123 51.9%
  • Nat Fyfe

    Votes: 114 48.1%

  • Total voters
    237

Remove this Banner Ad

Jesus. Fyfe by a mile.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Nup Danger leading the poll by a country mile
 
Dangerfield - 109 votes

Fyfe - 58 votes

lol
You have to remember the majority of those votes were cast at the end of last year.

Anyone who says Danger is better than Fyfe now is either an Adelaide supporter or stupid.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Let's not get cocky just yet. A lot can change in a year as you can all see. Danger had a poor year, whilst Fyfe had a great year. They're both young so the roles could reverse in a years time or even in 10 years time.

Just saving you all having to clean eggs off your face.
 
Fyfe is 2 years younger, and had already had a year that tops Dangers best year. Don't think anyone's going to have clean egg off of faces
Ok, mate. Don't want to start another s**t fight.

Look forward to bumping this in a year when Danger wins the brownlow. ;)
 
make this thread again and Fyfe wins by a lot, will be best player in the comp very soon
 
Are you guys seriously saying just because he plays for your team you have to argue he's better?

Bob Murphy's a gun. But is Birchall better? Yep.
 
Back
Top