Analysis Peel Thunder 2015 (TV schedule in OP)

[yakka man]

Is Crozier and C Pearce out there. WAFL website didn't have Crozier listed for the first part of the game, then added his name later wearing #7. C Pearce was listed, but now his name has dropped off.

I noticed the same thing about Crozier. I reckon he's playing.

 

[go_the_dockers]

Are Crozier and C Pearce out there. WAFL website didn't have Crozier listed for the first part of the game, then added his name later wearing #7. C Pearce was listed, but now his name has dropped off.

Only crozier playing.

 

[sherrif]

I don't want this to go further, but it's disappointing that you can't share an opinion on this forum without being condemned and insulted. All the Footy media have concerns about our scoring power and Premiership aspirations, so there is merit in my post.

Then at least answer my question. I have as much right to question an opinion that I think is massively off base as you do to make the opinion in the first place.

 

[yakka man]

Hannath is actually starting to consistently kick goals for Peel which is a good sign.

 

[DudleyDocker]

Seriously guys, can we create a thread where you can argue the point of who is too negative or not negative enough for YOUR TASTES?

I for one am sick of every thread becoming this same stupid s**t fight. I thought I might be safe to cone on the Peel thread, but here we go again.

I'm out.

 

[apuchar]

Seriously guys, can we create a thread where you can argue the point of who is too negative or not negative enough for YOUR TASTES?

I for one am sick of every thread becoming this same stupid s**t fight. I thought I might be safe to cone on the Peel thread, but here we go again.

I'm out.

Can you give us some info on the game before you run off. Not that I blame you though.

 

[sherrif]

Seriously guys, can we create a thread where you can argue the point of who is too negative or not negative enough for YOUR TASTES?

I for one am sick of every thread becoming this same stupid s**t fight. I thought I might be safe to cone on the Peel thread, but here we go again.

I'm out.

Fair point.

 

[yakka man]

Seriously guys, can we create a thread where you can argue the point of who is too negative or not negative enough for YOUR TASTES?

I for one am sick of every thread becoming this same stupid s**t fight. I thought I might be safe to cone on the Peel thread, but here we go again.

I'm out.

Sherrif started it

I'm done. Hurley is finding a bit of the ball, Weller quiet

Peel look like they're missing Blakely. It's amazing the influence he is having as an 19 year old.

 

[Righteo]

Chill, guys. It's possible to assert and reply to opinions without playing the man.

 

[The Anchorite]

Chill, guys. It's possible to assert and reply to opinions without playing the man.

What happened to your username? Were you attacked by some misguided spelling nazi?

On topic: who is playing on Schloithe?

 

[Righteo]

What happened to your username? Were you attacked by some misguided spelling nazi?

On topic: who is playing on Schloithe?

Felt like smartening it up a tad. After 5 years, for some reason.

Wonder if Schloithe will get a spot on a rookie list this year. Been one of South's better players this year and still only 22.

 

[freo_leo29]

Felt like smartening it up a tad. After 5 years, for some reason.

Wonder if Schloithe will get a spot on a rookie list this year. Been one of South's better players this year and still only 22.

Schloithes main tactic is ducking for frees, he probably averages 6 or so frees a match(honestly may be more), he just isn't very good and it won't work with AFL umpires (unless picked up by Eagles)

 

[apuchar]

Schloithes main tactic is ducking for frees, he probably averages 6 or so frees a match(honestly may be more), he just isn't very good and it won't work with AFL umpires (unless picked up by Eagles)

Plus he is pretty lazy apparently

 

[Allikat]

Schloithes main tactic is ducking for frees, he probably averages 6 or so frees a match(honestly may be more), he just isn't very good and it won't work with AFL umpires (unless picked up by Eagles)

Well Geelong need new players for next year so he might get a look in there

 

[Ragtooth]

Stats saying 4 tackles by hannath. That's pretty good

 

[PurpleReign]

I'm really enjoying watching Hughes play today. He's finding plenty of space across half back and delivering the ball nicely. Hurley looked like a real footballer in the first qtr, a bit quieter in the second.

 

[Kram]

Weller has hardly touched it.

 

[StingBitten]

Seriously guys, can we create a thread where you can argue the point of who is too negative or not negative enough for YOUR TASTES?

I for one am sick of every thread becoming this same stupid s**t fight. I thought I might be safe to cone on the Peel thread, but here we go again.

I'm out.

Hear *in hear.

 

[Grape Bear]

Is this being broadcast anywhere? Want a look-see.

What's Hurley playing as today, back or forward? He's certainly been a promising prospect, coming on a bit faster than expected.

 

[apuchar]

Is this being broadcast anywhere? Want a look-see.

What's Hurley playing as today, back or forward? He's certainly been a promising prospect, coming on a bit faster than expected.

No not being broadcast.

 

[Gekko71]

Brady has nine I50s for the game so far - he REALLY needs to force his way into the main squad. How's he doing today PurpleReign?

 

[jedi mind tricks]

I don't want this to go further, but it's disappointing that you can't share an opinion on this forum without being condemned and insulted. All the Footy media have concerns about our scoring power and Premiership aspirations, so there is merit in my post.

You lost me at media.

 

[yakka man]

You lost me at media.

Haha, the irony wasn't lost on me.

 

[apuchar]

Bloody waflonline has crashed again.

 

[yakka man]

I'm surprised Peel are in front. Looking at the stats a lot of FREO listed players are quiet.