Agreed, he is in their best 22, and agreed he is the best the saints have in that role. My only point is that I cant see him holding down the same amount of time within that role with other players coming through.
Didn't miss it, just dont really agree with it.
Fisher played 7 games last year, with 1 win, so he was hardly the difference for them.
Fisher playing that role is not going to be the difference between the Saints winning and loosing. Fisher can be just as effective for the saints, and as important to their chances of winning by straying deep and directing the backs from their.
And I honestly cant see the saints offloading Richardson after his second year giving the team he has inherited. He has already brought him some quality, but he needs time to develop them. I wouldn't expect a much better showing from the Saints this year than last year, and there is nothing wrong with that. Richardson needs to show improvement in the playing squad, and show that they are moving forward, the natural progression of players like Billings, Dunstan, Newnes, Webster etc, should ensure a couple of extra wins. Plus they will have a fully fit Joey and Steven. They should win a couple more games, but it wont be because of Fisher.
I don't think any single player has enough influence to determine weather the team wins or loses, except maybe Ablett, so I'm not sure what your getting at there.
By that logic Montagna is the same age and won't be a part of there next premiership so will he be playing in a FP or the reserves to give the young kids a go?
Also the turnover rate for coaches is high - coaching has low job security and the key metric that determines success is wins & losses. Kidding yourself if you don't think Richardson will be hell bent on winning regardless of expectation.