Contract extension critic Portia disagrees, probablyOnly a 1 year contract? Hmm... Should have been 2.
Why would we give 2 years to a guy who hasn't strung double figure consecutive games together at AFL level and whose body may not make it?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Contract extension critic Portia disagrees, probablyOnly a 1 year contract? Hmm... Should have been 2.
The worst thing is this year is probably the year to cull and find a couple of big blokes.Ports defensive six were poor against Freo - the careers of Logan, Stevenson and Heath may not be over just yet.
Only a 1 year contract? Hmm... Should have been 2.
I thin you have probably nailed it, but I still thin we need to retain Stevenson/Logan - our backs need to have pressure on their spots after last week. Stevo is an underrated player.Yea Redden is another guy who you hope gets on the park and kills it but may be just as likely to never play again.
So it seems a rough consensus for:
Delist: Hitchcock, Renouf, Stevenson, +/- Heath, (Cassisi)
Maybes: Ah Chee, Logan
Trade possibilities: Newton, Moore, ?Mitchell
Rookie upgrade: ?Mitchell
The two could be part of deals for sure but - it all depends on the balance of the deal. Who wins... what would we gain... both are dispensable for sure.What do people think about Neade or Pittard up for trade? I'll preface this with I am a fan of both players and would rather they stay. Just throwing up a suggestion for discussion considering we may need to offer players for some of the KPFs/Rucks we are chasing.
Both have worth, were high picks, have improvement to come but have some question marks over them. We have cover for their spots and they are replaceable. They are probably in that handful of players we could lose without costing us significantly - although Pittard has come a long way this year.
In regards to Pittard and the bolded, do we?What do people think about Neade or Pittard up for trade? I'll preface this with I am a fan of both players and would rather they stay. Just throwing up a suggestion for discussion considering we may need to offer players for some of the KPFs/Rucks we are chasing.
Both have worth, were high picks, have improvement to come but have some question marks over them. We have cover for their spots and they are replaceable. They are probably in that handful of players we could lose without costing us significantly - although Pittard has come a long way this year.
What do people think about Neade or Pittard up for trade? I'll preface this with I am a fan of both players and would rather they stay. Just throwing up a suggestion for discussion considering we may need to offer players for some of the KPFs/Rucks we are chasing.
Both have worth, were high picks, have improvement to come but have some question marks over them. We have cover for their spots and they are replaceable. They are probably in that handful of players we could lose without costing us significantly - although Pittard has come a long way this year.
Pittard wont be going anywhere... Ken loves him as a player lolWhat do people think about Neade or Pittard up for trade? I'll preface this with I am a fan of both players and would rather they stay. Just throwing up a suggestion for discussion considering we may need to offer players for some of the KPFs/Rucks we are chasing.
Both have worth, were high picks, have improvement to come but have some question marks over them. We have cover for their spots and they are replaceable. They are probably in that handful of players we could lose without costing us significantly - although Pittard has come a long way this year.
Walker will be a free agent!
Walker would be nice but his life would become a nightmare from vindictive crosies and it would have an impact on his game for a year or two.
He's actually a pretty nice guy so he would probably find it hard, 2 games a year would really test his resolve. Still worth the chat though I reckon.