Privateye
Cancelled
Yeh, next we will have Bob Down on here back Briza up and Sausage Roll as well telling you to nick off.You need to calm down Marty.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yeh, next we will have Bob Down on here back Briza up and Sausage Roll as well telling you to nick off.You need to calm down Marty.
What is going on with the VAFA? They show Watts doing that and put it up as a joke to everyone. Disgraceful act
Talking of disgraceful acts #17 from collegians starting the melee featured by doing what I would classify as one of the most disgraceful and dangerous acts iv seen on a footy field. Wonder what the VAFAs view would of been if the st. Bernard's player sustained a serious neck/head injury. Laying unprotected on the ground with #17 going directly for the head as 3rd player in. Vafa/St.bern kidding themselves if they'd don't take action on this. But instead the vafa choose to trivialise this by putting it in as "whine" of the week.
Would be interested to hear Penskis thoughts on the incident. Doesn't make Collegians Fc look great.
Same thing happened to Coll"s S Taft two weeks prior...10 stitches later. There were extenuating circumstances to the incident you mentioned and no, Im not condoning his actions.... You obviously havent seen to much football
The same did not happen to Taft. He was not intentionally trodden on (ala Watts). That case was referred to the tribunal and he was found not guilty. It was also in play, unlike the intentional act by Watts.Same thing happened to Coll"s S Taft two weeks prior...10 stitches later. There were extenuating circumstances to the incident you mentioned and no, Im not condoning his actions.... You obviously havent seen to much football
In fact, the only outcome of the Taft incident was the other Watts brother carrying on like a peanut.The same did not happen to Taft. He was not intentionally trodden on (ala Watts). That case was referred to the tribunal and he was found not guilty. It was also in play, unlike the intentional act by Watts.
In fact, the only outcome of the Taft incident was the other Watts brother carrying on like a peanut.
In fact, on like a peanut.
Read the posts carefully. Not me.I wasnt comparing J Watts actions to that of Tafts incident, but Archange mentioning #17 of Colls actions as the worst action he has seen in footy. He goes onto criticise the Coll footy club. After the incident Taft incident Coll didnt "squel, after the Bernies incident St Bernards didnt
squel. The only one "arcking". up is Archange
And you failed to mention that it went to the tribunal where the UB player was found not guilty. Taft isn't the first bloke to get some stitches.Darwin," the only outcome of the Taft incident was the other Watts brother carrying on " You failed to mention his visit to the Drs. surgery.
I'd love you next to me in the "trenches" when things get willing.........not.
And you failed to mention that it went to the tribunal where the UB player was found not guilty. Taft isn't the first bloke to get some stitches.
Would love to be in the "trenches" with you, fainting all over the plce whenever a bloke needed a couple of stitches.
On a different note, I have had a chance to see Fitzy's section on VAFA tragics.
My initial response is that the section is designed to be controversial, so we should take most of it with a grain of salt.
However.. what does he gain by belittling a struggling club and questioning their desire to improve? Many clubs in their situation would not exist anymore. Nevertheless they turn up every week and have a go, and Schwabby is a legend who has always given his all. They do not have the resources, nor the player pools of probably 75% of the amateur clubs, let alone the 400 boys leaving Xavier College each year. Maybe Fitzy would like to direct some of the boys missing games at Xavier down there, or offer a hand to their committee. Being controversial is one thing, bullying, denigrating, pontificating,and grandstanding are another. I think I know where Fitzy stepped this week, hopefully he can avoid treading there in the future.
I propose that Jascave replaces Fitzy for the next VAFA tragic show. Far more popular and far less controversial.Was watching the 1993 VAFA Grand Final between Collegians and De La Salle on YouTube. Couldn't believe the muddy state of the ground at Elsternwick Park/Sportscover Arena.
I suspect Fitzy may be doing a little back-peddling next week. Otherwise this 'tragics' show is going to go downhill very quickly. You can't have a program like this and use it as a vehicle to knock down the clubs that need the most support. Maybe Fitzy can go down there himself this weekend and volunteer for Chadstone in some capacity, rather than swanning around Toorak Park on a Saturday afternoon.
Collegians
DLS
Bernard's
Blues
Xavs
Interested to know reasons for tipping DLS over Blacks?
Every round throws us some excellent games and this round is no exception.
Beaumaris v Collegians- Interesting game. Collegians were average for the first 3 rounds but have knocked off Bernards and Blues in the past two. Going on form Collegians should win this.
Carey v St Bernards- Winner of this game will be two games clear of 5th. Game of the round for me. Carey have been moving the ball very well this year and the bottom 6 players have improved. Carey by 10 points.
Uni Blues v Trinity- Blues are better than there record shows, however, the big ground at uni is similar to the Daley and Trinity will win it by 3 goals.
Xavs v Scotch- No one knows which Scotch will turn up. Will be a close game but Xavs to win by less than a kick.
De la v Blacks- De la are desperate for a win, however, they come up against a confident Blacks team. Blacks in another close game.
What were the extenuating circumstances?Same thing happened to Coll"s S Taft two weeks prior...10 stitches later. There were extenuating circumstances to the incident you mentioned and no, Im not condoning his actions.... You obviously havent seen to much football
Since the point system is a topic.
How many does say a player who comes from the bush as a kid(think Uni sides here) plays a few years, moves to VFL( or even AFL), plays senior football, then returns get given? Current examples are Ross Young, Dan Nicholson, Julian Rowe off the top of my head. It would be 5 or 6 points under the system suggested but I believe should be 1 or 2 points in reality as they are returning to their home club