Janus
Advocatus Diaboli
- Sep 9, 2007
- 23,350
- 57,117
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Dallas Cowboys, Chicago Bulls
What makes Neade and Young - two who struggled in losses themselves this year - a more justified selection than Mitchell or Gray? Moore has played 1 game in a month so I cant see how people could expect him to be gifted a game either.
In any case, these guys are icing. When the cake is going off, any amount of icing isnt going to fix it.
I've never ragged on Mitchell's selection. I know why he was selected.
Gray on the other hand, was so mind boggling baffling that you have to wonder if the selection committee has money on our opposition. He doesn't play that small forward pressure role ever in the SANFL. But hey, lets gift him a game in that role because we don't have anyone else who is worthy of selection even though we've again been smashed around stoppages that aren't in the center. Funny how you label a big mid like Moore icing - I guess Gray's grand total of 2 tackles (even though in your review you reckon he tackled well at times) would be like a sprinkle of icing sugar in comparison.
I don't care how great he is at training, or how good his form is. If he's not being selected as a mid, where his form is actually displayed, then he's as useless as **** on a bull. No one is expecting him to come in and win us games. Who on here has ever said that?? We do, however, expect any changes at the selection table to have a meaningful and noticeable impact on performance, regardless of how well the rest of the team is playing. Otherwise what's the point of changing the team? Young was excellent in his first game. Ah Chee did some nice things as the sub, as did Amon. But Gray? Sorry Macca, you're toeing the company line a bit too much trying to defend this one. I understand the idea behind it, and I like him as much as anyone could like a smallish midfielder, but if Gray isn't out of the team this week, we've obviously decided to tank.