- Banned
- #1
OK, let's have a discussion. This was inspired because I was talking with my old man recently about the 1986 Melbourne Cup. I was a 10 year old at the time, and he and I caught a train to the races. On the train, I devised a points allocation method for doing the form. I allocated points for their distance strike rate, track strike rate, track and distance, going, and overall strike rate. I think I also gave points based on their recent finishing positions. Anyway, I totalled them up, and it selected At Talaq on top. I had $10 on him, up he got at 5/1, and the addicted gambling mess you see before you 28 years later is the result of that.
So, what factors do you consider when you're doing the form? Traditionally, the ones I listed above are fairly standard ones. If you look in most form guides they'll readily give you an indication of the horses distance, track, going and overall ability.
But what's the best way to quantify these factors? Is looking at one horse's strike rate above another's a reliable enough method, or not? I would love to have access to the points method I invented all those years ago, if only to see how a 10 year old approached it, but I have a fair idea of what I did, anyway. It was something like 0 to 5 points for each factor, totalled up.
Roger Biggs, and others, use IV (Impact Value) figures to quantify a horses chance given the prevailing conditions.
How do you approach form factors, and how do you quantify them, and what form factors do you find are important?
So, what factors do you consider when you're doing the form? Traditionally, the ones I listed above are fairly standard ones. If you look in most form guides they'll readily give you an indication of the horses distance, track, going and overall ability.
But what's the best way to quantify these factors? Is looking at one horse's strike rate above another's a reliable enough method, or not? I would love to have access to the points method I invented all those years ago, if only to see how a 10 year old approached it, but I have a fair idea of what I did, anyway. It was something like 0 to 5 points for each factor, totalled up.
Roger Biggs, and others, use IV (Impact Value) figures to quantify a horses chance given the prevailing conditions.
How do you approach form factors, and how do you quantify them, and what form factors do you find are important?