mickfaxis
Club Legend
- Sep 28, 2014
- 2,369
- 2,867
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
He's a constant twitterer if thats a word
If we were purely social-mediaising (?) his contract...then there's no doubt he's staying.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: St Kilda v Western Bulldogs - 7:30PM Thu
Squiggle tips Saints at 51% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
He's a constant twitterer if thats a word
He's a constant twitterer if thats a word
This is the most informative post of this thread!Tweeter i believe to be the right use of the adjective
Ok PhilI've been running this through my head, I'm not sure how it would work or if it's even feasible but do you guys think it would be possible for Adelaide to offer Danger a 5 year contract at 1 mil per year or something similar (provided we have cap space) with a gentleman's agreement that we will facilitate a trade away if he was so inclined? That way he has financial security for the next 5 years and we would receive the compensation we deserve in a fair trade should he wish to leave.
I've been running this through my head, I'm not sure how it would work or if it's even feasible but do you guys think it would be possible for Adelaide to offer Danger a 5 year contract at 1 mil per year or something similar (provided we have cap space) with a gentleman's agreement that we will facilitate a trade away if he was so inclined? That way he has financial security for the next 5 years and we would receive the compensation we deserve in a fair trade should he wish to leave.
Bit down about the Bulldogs game but on the bright side it means we can expect a media conference tomorrow announcing Paddy has inked the deal to stay on at AFC.
I've been running this through my head, I'm not sure how it would work or if it's even feasible but do you guys think it would be possible for Adelaide to offer Danger a 5 year contract at 1 mil per year or something similar (provided we have cap space) with a gentleman's agreement that we will facilitate a trade away if he was so inclined? That way he has financial security for the next 5 years and we would receive the compensation we deserve in a fair trade should he wish to leave.
I've been running this through my head, I'm not sure how it would work or if it's even feasible but do you guys think it would be possible for Adelaide to offer Danger a 5 year contract at 1 mil per year or something similar (provided we have cap space) with a gentleman's agreement that we will facilitate a trade away if he was so inclined? That way he has financial security for the next 5 years and we would receive the compensation we deserve in a fair trade should he wish to leave.
I think GCS and carlton have proven to us that paying a single player 10% of your cap space is a sure fire way to destroy any chance of success.At the moment dangerfield isnt playing like a million dollar player. If he keeps it up we might only have to pay him 700 k.
I think GCS and carlton have proven to us that paying a single player 10% of your cap space is a sure fire way to destroy any chance of success.
If it's danger for a mill a year or nothing, I'll take door number 2 thanks.
COLA. Equivalent to us paying two gun players $500k eachbut on the flip side, sydney pay 2 players almost 10% each and yet they arent cellar dwellers...
I've been running this through my head, I'm not sure how it would work or if it's even feasible but do you guys think it would be possible for Adelaide to offer Danger a 5 year contract at 1 mil per year or something similar (provided we have cap space) with a gentleman's agreement that we will facilitate a trade away if he was so inclined? That way he has financial security for the next 5 years and we would receive the compensation we deserve in a fair trade should he wish to leave.
COLA. Equivalent to us paying two gun players $500k each
You clearly have zero comprehension on how marginal economics works.No it isn't. The equivalent of us paying a player $1,000,000 a season is them paying a player $1,098,000. Their salary cap isn't twice as large as the rest of the competition.
You clearly have zero comprehension on how marginal economics works.
Clearly you believe Sydney when they say that they pay each and every player on their list 10% more so as to distribute the COLA evenly across their playing group.
COLA. Equivalent to us paying two gun players $500k each
Yes, no, yes, no, yes, yes... the last three are harder but I'll go with no, yes, yes.In 3 years time will Jenkins, Martin, Hartigan, Shaw, VB, McKay, Lyons, grigg and Wright still be on our list.
I agree that it's depressing but I can see them all staying on our list. The only definite outs from that list are Martin and Shaw. 3 years is a long time though so hopefully there's a few more gone.Errr Jenkins, hartigan,vb and McKay still there, how depressing.