- Feb 13, 2013
- 2,644
- 2,510
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
- Other Teams
- Chicago Bears, Chicago Blackhawks
Here's what I don't get.
If Eade leaves with two years left, then he surely can't be paid for those two remaining years.
If the payer sacks the payee under contract, they must pay them out. So conversly, wouldn't a payee who leaves before the end of his contract forfeit that pay? The one who breaches the contract is the one out of pocket.
So how is Collingwood massively out of pocket if they save two years worth of pay that would have gone to Eade, and why not use that as part of a payment to get another footy manager?
There is no way that Eade can expect to get paid by Collingwood for 2015-16 if he is coaching GC Suns, so you save some money there.
It comes down to having to now poach someone out of an established position very late in the year (provided we want someone with good experience), which can only be done by spending more money than we would have on Eade. No money will be saved because we will have to offer someone the same position but at a greater wage, which also affects the whole football department tax thing.
Usually clubs have all these sorts of positions sorted out well before this busy time of the year. However, in the last two seasons or so we have seen more and more that coaches are getting axed late and suddenly leaving everyone in scramble to get someone new, messing up the plans of others. This is not the first, nor the last compensation claim to be made in relation to personnel leaving.