-
LIVE: St Kilda v Western Bulldogs - 7:30PM Thu
Squiggle tips Saints at 51% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
Preview Round 22 Changes vs. Melbourne
- Thread starter YelloMit
- Start date
- Tagged users None
- Status
I just looked at the updated weather forecast and it's looking like it'll be fine now.
- Sep 27, 2013
- 2,913
- 4,543
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
- Other Teams
- Philadelpia 76'ers
Can't see what we gain by playing Duffield again, far too slow and a shadow of his former self.
Spoken4
Norm Smith Medallist
- Aug 20, 2009
- 1,361
- 1,682
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
- Other Teams
- Lakers
Lost mate
- Sep 16, 2006
- 35,869
- 35,464
- AFL Club
- West Coast
Nah just want you guys to win on the weekend... don't want Hawks finishing top 2.Lost mate
Banker
Club Legend
- May 17, 2014
- 2,906
- 1,931
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
Playing Sheridan in Duffields position is useless, as its the same output. We need Sheridan in the midfield where he can excel.
What people forget is that Duffield is a good footballer with brains and good accuracy which we have lacked.
Lion of Panjshir
Team Captain
- May 7, 2010
- 310
- 428
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
Jon Ralph has picked us to win by 134 points.
How does Pearce playing like s**t free up Hill?
I don't really buy this anymore tbh. Has anyone seen the space the opposition allows Pearce every week? If anything it's the other way around, the opposition focus more on Hill (understandably) because they're not worried about Pearce getting a lot of the footy.
Banker
Club Legend
- May 17, 2014
- 2,906
- 1,931
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
Even though he plays like s**t the opposition still worries about him as his meters gained is high.
I can't think of any other reason to play him else wise.
Banker
Club Legend
- May 17, 2014
- 2,906
- 1,931
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
Then I would think he is only in the side for meters gained which he usually equals Hill for. I suppose even with bad meters gained he helps us create a forward/midfield press. I have been saying for awhile he needs a rest, no idea why he is never afforded this.
I felt his season last year was more consistent, this year after the first 10 games its turned horrible. Hope he hasn't burned himself out.
Maybe someone who can actually kick and hit targets?
oh NO! the same dick who gave Goldstein 2 votes (3 being the max) in last weeks Herald Sun award so he could conveniently narrow the gap to fyfe to just 3 votes with 2 games to go. I am more worried about this week now. that guy has no clue
about 4 weeks back I said no more Duffield and Mzungu as they are past their prime. if both play I think the ole panic button is not far away. our form has hit rock bottom for this year. got to make a stand and gets some flow and confidence. Walters has been carrying the hopes of the team .hope he stays sound and in form because if he goes we have a massive uphill battle to just win a final, let alone 3
This is a good point. Maybe it's coincidence, but our four losses have been when D. Pearce has had probably his worst 4 games of the year. Could be a bit of the chicken/egg scenario, especially for a receiver who might struggle if the side is getting beaten in general. Whatever the case, there is a reasonably high correlation between Pearce and the team's form, and an in-form Pearce is important.
Clancee was also killing it in the early season. We really need him to find that form again. Hoping these young blokes like Langdon or Weller come in and do something good ... you just can't expect them to do much at all apart from a small cameo. But the Pearces have shown they can be strong contributors.
Look at that stretch from Rd 5-8. When you have our core mids (Mundy, Fyfe, Barlow, Hill, Neale) doing their thing, then add 25 touches from the Pearces, that's when we actually resemble a flag winning side. I honestly don't think we can trouble WC and Hawthorn unless the Pearces come to the party. There's only so much our main 5 mids can do, they need support.
He's such a dick. That way anything less than a 22 goal win is us underachieving...
I agree. Pearce moves the ball quick and long at almost every opportunity and I think it's been clear that Ross wants us to play that way more often this year. Pearce and Hill follow out his directives perfectly I reckon.
The issue with Pearce is stage fright, and huge lapses mid-game (or quarter) which result in costly turnovers. He's a very direct player but has pretty poor awareness which leads to getting run down frequently. His decision making when confronted with heavy traffic is also questionable. He is generally money when it comes to goals on the run, and to his credit has kicked more this season than his previous years. He's also capable, although not often enough for my liking, of laser passes inside 50 which sit perfectly to our forward's advantage. Massive, massive tease.
As Alfonz pointed out he is a huge barometer for our team, like it or not, and given there's no way he's getting dropped anytime soon I'd say he's going to be one of our most important players this finals series. One way or the other.
He is such a campaigner as well, adjudicates on possible MRP issues during a game with absolute guesswork and keeps rehashing it on Twitter..
This might seem an exaggeration, but he's the most incompetent person associated with the footy media. I say associated because I can't bring myself to see him as a credible journalist.
A pretty reasonable accomplishment really.
Have you forgotten about Mark Stevens?
- Jul 15, 2007
- 9,634
- 7,239
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
- Other Teams
- Boston Celtics, Patriots
We gain an accurate, smart, dependable user of the ball. I would loved to have had him playing last week.
Having said that, his card is stamped, clearly RTB has moved on to the more speedier and almost as good with ball in hand Sherro (and Sutty to a degree), and I think it's the right move, but I think people forget how good Duffield has been for us in the past.
Hard to say what is more unrealistic. Us kicking 134 points or keeping Melbourne to no score .
- Status
Similar threads
