Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Richmond v Melbourne - 7:25PM Wed
Squiggle tips Demons at 77% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
Not happy with today, should have smacked them by more.
Rockliff's had 44 but hasn't really impacted the game at all
Plus 14 tackles and a goal. Think you might be potting the wrong dude.
Billy is devastating as a sub.Billy!
We would have lost by 100+ without himRockliff's had 44 but hasn't really impacted the game at all
Huge stats but you wouldn't say that was one of his best games would you?
We would have lost by 100+ without him
made us look like a proper team, with out him it would of been dreadful, by far the best player for brisbane and probably the best on the ground completely.Huge stats but you wouldn't say that was one of his best games would you?
Would love him at Hawthorn.Actually I would. Put him in a better team and his influence would be much more noticeable. He's only one man.
for a player to get BOG in a team that loses by 72 points he must be doing something well.Huge stats but you wouldn't say that was one of his best games would you?
for a player to get BOG in a team that loses by 72 points he must be doing something well.
Good players in bad teams are easy targets. If Sam Mitchell played for Melbourne, there would be people potting him too.
45 possession mean nothing in this day and age
as a neutral watching he seemed by far the best, who was in your opinion?Rockliff wasn't bog
Yeah he absolutely did.no he didn't that is a 50 every day of the week awful umpiring, he wont be there in the finals.
cyril has to go with his man, see his facing the other way when green has run off meaning he is in the danger zone lol.Yeah he absolutely did.
First pick is Cyril standing with his player therefore allowed to be there. Notice rockliff going off the line?
View attachment 167637
next shot is less that half a second later (cyrils player had only taken one and a half steps. umpires clearly already almost completed his 'play on' call:
View attachment 167639
Rockliff had begun to go off his line.
Now the "play on" you may argue was incorrect, but he had gone off the line. the free was paid were Langford was standing. I personally think they call play on too early in general, and this is an example of.
go back to first pick.Cyril is literally touching his man. Rockliff is already off his line. Rockliffs line is 2 meters behind him. It only takes one step. LOLcyril has to go with his man, see his facing the other way when green has run off meaning he is in the danger zone lol.
Good players in bad teams are easy targets. If Sam Mitchell played for Melbourne, there would be people potting him too.
Brisbane will lead at 3 quarter time - watch this space
doesnt matter cyril left his man and entered the dangerzone before the umpire called play on.go back to first pick.Cyril is literally touching his man. Rockliff is already off his line. Rockliffs line is 2 meters behind him. It only takes one step. LOL
But he hadn't. otherwise all you have to do is take a mark and kick the ball into a player in the protected zone, instant fifty.doesnt matter cyril left his man and entered the dangerzone before the umpire called play on.
doesn't matter now just one of the terrible decisions the umpires made in a disgraceful performance by the men in green.But he hadn't. otherwise all you have to do is take a mark and kick the ball into a player in the protected zone, instant fifty.
The umpire also would have yelled "play on" before fully extending his arms here:
View attachment 167646
What we cant deduce from all these images is at which point "play on" was yelled, and judging by cyrils jumping, it was early, and the fact the umpire let it go agrees with this. Do you have some concrete evidence to the contrary? cause everything points to a correct call.