Yes. But the Yellow Peril isn't made by BLK
Discussion Round 8, 2015 - Footy Jumper Discussion
- Thread starter Jack Stevens
- Start date
- Tagged users None
Groupie_
time to return the traditional Richmond yellow
Yellow shorts and inverse socks
Thick black lines on the sides of the shorts though. My fantasy
Thick black lines on the sides of the shorts though. My fantasy
The Half Back
BC Approved
Yeh, on second thought, you make a good point, black shorts look better but wouldn't work against port.
Just as Hawthorn looks great with the dark block of brown under their yellow jumpers.
Groupie_
time to return the traditional Richmond yellow
Tigers clash has black numbers with white outline like the VFL Tigers clash
GAGF dud delist
GAGF dud delist
Last edited:
They were always going to get something wrong.Tigers clash has black numbers with white outline like the VFL Tigers clash
GAGF dud delist
Fizzler
BBTB
- Dec 26, 2013
- 12,769
- 16,360
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
- Other Teams
- OKC, Coburg, Werribee, Storm, QPR
Are you being serious? How is that a problem? White numbers would look s**t and it's barely any different from black numbers. Be happy you've got the inverse clash.Tigers clash has black numbers with white outline like the VFL Tigers clash
GAGF dud delist
- Aug 25, 2014
- 7,718
- 11,772
- AFL Club
- Richmond
that is a really interesting GPS tag....
- Aug 25, 2014
- 7,718
- 11,772
- AFL Club
- Richmond
white outline is the problem mate not a white number
Fizzler
BBTB
- Dec 26, 2013
- 12,769
- 16,360
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
- Other Teams
- OKC, Coburg, Werribee, Storm, QPR
What I was getting at was What difference would it make if there wasn't a stroke.
How is the white outline a problem?
Groupie_
time to return the traditional Richmond yellow
What are u on about ? When did I say I want white numbers lol
I want black numbers without the outline, its not needed.
- Aug 25, 2014
- 7,718
- 11,772
- AFL Club
- Richmond
ask Groupie_ I never said I had a problem with it
Groupie_
time to return the traditional Richmond yellow
It doesn't look s**t. It's there to make the number stand out more.
E92_
Premium Platinum
But it doesn't and it looks stupid.
The royal wings looks 10x better with solid yellow numbers instead of the white stroke.
The white in the Saint's tri-panel means that the royal blue shorts should be worn by WCE.
The Fitzroy red doesn't differ a whole lot from the Essendon red. The Lions will probably wear their Melbourne strip, but the match would be far more presentable if they wore their clash.
Bacon Warrior
D10
WCE's royal isn't a bright blue. It's quite dark and that's probably the reason why we don't wear royal shorts more often.
We should, and will be wearing white shorts.
We should, and will be wearing white shorts.
CollarJazzKnee
All Australian
- Mar 17, 2015
- 851
- 1,057
- AFL Club
- Geelong
- Other Teams
- Green Bay Packers
Would really like to see brisbane in their fitzroy jumpers wearing royal shorts. Maybe geelong will let them?
To be honest, I don't really care who wears what (let alone about you as a poster). I'm just stating my opinion relevant to Gillon & co's white-shorts rule.
No s**t, Sherlock Holmes.
Away to teams such as Adelaide, Carlton, Essendon, Hawthorn etc., adding the white shorts to the royal guernsey is totally necessary.
Why? Additional contrast that works away from those listed team's colours.
Against a team with a significant amount of white on their guernsey? I don't think so.
Last edited:
