Royal Commission into Labor's home insulation program

Remove this Banner Ad

Feb 21, 2002
39,135
12,588
Hawaii
AFL Club
Western Bulldogs
This should be interesting

The coalition is pressing ahead with its plan for a royal commission into Labor's home insulation program. Attorney-General George Brandis said cabinet had given the go-ahead for a detailed examination of the scheme, which cost four lives and caused extensive damage to property.... Senator Brandis said the government would soon recommend terms of reference to the Governor-General and the appointment of an eminent lawyer as royal commissioner....Senator Brandis said it would focus on the process of decisions to establish and implement the scheme, including the identification and management of risks and assessment....

It will also examine what advice, warnings or recommendations were given to or sought by the government. The inquiry will assess whether any changes should be made to laws, practices, processes, procedures and systems. Senator Brandis said the commission would assess all relevant matters from inception of the policy to its finalisation, including findings of coronial inquests and other inquiries. He said the government consulted the families in developing the proposed terms of reference. The commission will report by June 30, 2014.

http://au.news.yahoo.com/a/19831322/govt-pushes-on-with-pink-batts-inquiry/
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Very wise of KRudd to quit the parliament before this inquiry takes place.

Fortunately it is a very rare occurrence for a Labor government to throw out occupational health and safety protections, to encourage fly by nighters to take over industries and then not ensure that proper training is put in place, particularly for young employees.

The inquiry will assess whether any changes should be made to laws, practices, processes, procedures and systems

Most important task for inquiry.
 
Very wise of KRudd to quit the parliament before this inquiry takes place.

Fortunately it is a very rare occurrence for a Labor government to throw out occupational health and safety protections, to encourage fly by nighters to take over industries and then not ensure that proper training is put in place, particularly for young employees.



Most important task for inquiry.

I wonder if this will include all working sites/industries or whether it will only apply to the home insulation industry.
 
I wonder if this will include all working sites/industries or whether it will only apply to the home insulation industry.

Am not sure this extraordinary situation has ever arisen elsewhere?

As you would know the union movement would have been constrained from acting when their warnings were disregarded because they were dealing with a Labor govt and big hero Rudd.
 
I think there will be many in the Labor movement - both unions and Party and leadership especially Shorten - who will be very keen on this inquiry and nailing Rudd for it. Number one in queue Peter Garrett.

If nothing else it should ensure that the episode is never ever repeated.
 
If nothing else it should ensure that the episode is never ever repeated.
The only thing that it will be is a tremendously expensive political stunt.

If they really wanted to nail Rudd on something worthwhile, they would hold a Royal Commission into bank practices post GFC and the CBA take over of Bankwest.
 
I thought it was just going to be a judicial review, not a full blown Royal Commission. Has this changed, or is this just over-enthusiastic reporting?
 
I think there will be many in the Labor movement - both unions and Party and leadership especially Shorten - who will be very keen on this inquiry and nailing Rudd for it. Number one in queue Peter Garrett.

If nothing else it should ensure that the episode is never ever repeated.

Is that reason enough for a Royal Commission?
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

I bet you a pink batt that the will add the cost of the inquiry to the alleged waste associated with the original scheme

We didn't get a commission into the Iraq WMD scandal did we ? That's rigtht it was a coalition govt that did it. Whereas in the uk it was a labor govt that did it
 
Report by June 30, 2014...

Clearly a politically motivated witchhunt aimed and timed so that if they need a DD election after the new senate sits on July 1st, they've got plenty to use against the ALP.

Yeah, the ALP stuffed up that program, and investigation to avoid such mistakes happening again should a government see the need for a quick stimulus package does make a degree of sense, but a Royal Commission is clearly overkill. An internal departmental inquiry (with a few leaks, because it's politics after all) would have done the job more than adequately.
 
The ALP will be absolutely gleeful about this because rather than the Coalition being able to beat them over the head with it they will have royal commision findings of it being a case of contractor negligence operating under state-level regulation producing an incident rate at or below prior industry averages.
 
Report by June 30, 2014...

Clearly a politically motivated witchhunt aimed and timed so that if they need a DD election after the new senate sits on July 1st, they've got plenty to use against the ALP.

Yeah, the ALP stuffed up that program, and investigation to avoid such mistakes happening again should a government see the need for a quick stimulus package does make a degree of sense, but a Royal Commission is clearly overkill. An internal departmental inquiry (with a few leaks, because it's politics after all) would have done the job more than adequately.

Problem with that is

If the ashby appeal gets dismissed , the libs/lnp were found by a court to be involved in an political plot against the former coalition member and speaker of the house and government.

Labor would be the only party what has a legit case to call an royal commission(into the libs/lnp)

that would be a good dd election bonus for labor
 
Presumably a royal commission will call on at least one person with a working understanding of statistics to demonstrate that the rate of insulation fires actually decreased under the scheme too.
 
The ALP will be absolutely gleeful about this because rather than the Coalition being able to beat them over the head with it they will have royal commision findings of it being a case of contractor negligence operating under state-level regulation producing an incident rate at or below prior industry averages.
This is the thing I've always tried to find out: was it actually worse, or did it just seem worse?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top