- Apr 27, 2014
- 29,189
- 57,638
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- The Fanboi Farters
So who's at fault for our facilities and DC not being up to scratchBtter facilities and development coaches which costs a heap
Very gutted Richmond won aren't you.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So who's at fault for our facilities and DC not being up to scratchBtter facilities and development coaches which costs a heap
Very gutted Richmond won aren't you.
The darksiders who throw toys out prams even when Richmond win games.So who's at fault for our facilities and DC not being up to scratch
Relax mate i dont even own a microwave. I'm just saying youre still full of excuses and this seems to be the mantra the club pushes. forget it the DogsThe Ying and Yang Tiger show.
The darksiders who throw toys out prams even when Richmond win games.
Why is Wallace proudly displayed on your avatar?
Watched the worst game of my time here on Earth when he coached us against Geelong.
And we had some stinking wins under him also,remember the Adelaide game?
Take a good breath and a cup of tea and relax.
RFC will only become stronger if the memberships get stronger ,not the other way round.
Throwing your membership out of the pram only makes the club weaker in the long run.
Rubbish.Relax mate i dont even own a microwave. I'm just saying youre still full of excuses and this seems to be the mantra the club pushes. forget it the Dogs
Saints and other clubs work on losses compared to us ,but don't hear them crying
thats bc i'm easily stooged after two beers.yeah right mate you would have to be on ice firstThe only way we would do it, if we did it drunk. But Im in!
Where?Rubbish.
Whats wrong with trying something different? Thats how Richo almost won a Brownlow.We would have won by more on the weekend had Damien Hardwick not done a monumental screw-up in the first quarter.
Chillax y'all
It is not wrong to try something different, but that doesn’t mean that it wasn't a screw up. It may work later on, but not while Elton is still inexperiencedWhats wrong with trying something different? Thats how Richo almost won a Brownlow.
A screw up would have been trying that in the last quarter. Something not working isn't a screw up.It is not wrong to try something different, but that doesn’t mean that it wasn't a screw up. It may work later on, but not while Elton is still inexperienced
I disagree. Removing you best defender and leaving a 2nd gamer to play on someone like Cloke is a screw up in my opinion. Now, putting Riewoldt in the middle and Dustin Martin up front was not a screw up, because that is reasonable even if it didn't work outA screw up would have been trying that in the last quarter. Something not working isn't a screw up.
Wasnt it Grimes who played on someone like Cloke and did extremely well in just his second game? As Dimma said we need a bigger body in the midfield and Eltons VFL form was very good so he gave him a chance to play on Cloke. Both moves could have worked out well. Definitely not a screw up.I disagree. Removing you best defender and leaving a 2nd gamer to play on someone like Cloke is a screw up in my opinion. Now, putting Riewoldt in the middle and Dustin Martin up front was not a screw up, because that is reasonable even if it didn't work out
But vacating your best defender from the backline for a 2nd gamer? Nope. If Elton was not a 2nd-gamer and was playing for a year at senior level, then you could say that it would not have been a screw up, because it is trying something new.
I really do understand where you are coming from, but I just don't see it that way at the moment. To me, the result was obvious before he did that match up.Wasnt it Grimes who played on someone like Cloke and did extremely well in just his second game? As Dimma said we need a bigger body in the midfield and Eltons VFL form was very good so he gave him a chance to play on Cloke. Both moves could have worked out well. Definitely not a screw up.
Not sure if it's been mentioned elsewhere but if DH was too coach on next year, I would not be against having Malthouse in as a 'senior coaching advisor'.
We have a lot of inexperience in the coaching ranks.
I understand that Mick may be available as soon as Monday afternoon.
Not sure if it's been mentioned elsewhere but if DH was too coach on next year, I would not be against having Malthouse in as a 'senior coaching advisor'.
We have a lot of inexperience in the coaching ranks.
I understand that Mick may be available as soon as Monday afternoon.
Mick is no1 and is no no2.Not sure if it's been mentioned elsewhere but if DH was too coach on next year, I would not be against having Malthouse in as a 'senior coaching advisor'.
We have a lot of inexperience in the coaching ranks.
I understand that Mick may be available as soon as Monday afternoon.
I have a sneaky suspicion this will be it for Mick. Can make money in the media and return the pot shots.
Casbolt shanks to Tutt who fumbles to Wood who fresh airs it then dribbles it to Jones who kicks it out on the full.
The worlds best coach couldn't do anything with these bunch of jokes.
Before anyone says so it's the players fault and not the coaches... what about Dimma?... Well Hardwick has far more talent at his disposal.
And how about the curses he has created.....Bulldogs, Demons etc
I can honestly say, you're all idiots.
Arguing over the definition of "your way"/"our way"/"his way"/"milky way". I have never seen a dumber thing argued with such intent.
Love you guys.
We have to try it at some stage, Rance is gone. The more experience Elton gets the better..I disagree. Removing you best defender and leaving a 2nd gamer to play on someone like Cloke is a screw up in my opinion. Now, putting Riewoldt in the middle and Dustin Martin up front was not a screw up, because that is reasonable even if it didn't work out
But vacating your best defender from the backline for a 2nd gamer? Nope. If Elton was not a 2nd-gamer and was playing for a year at senior level, then you could say that it would not have been a screw up, because it is trying something new.