-
LIVE: Richmond v Melbourne - 7:25PM Wed
Squiggle tips Demons at 77% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
Seeya dudes
- Thread starter PaddyO
- Start date
- Tagged users None
- Status
- Sep 22, 2000
- 62,351
- 41,697
- AFL Club
- Geelong
- Other Teams
- Ford
Why does the OP still exist ?
If campaigners want to start threads telling us they're going but then comeback with in days Mods should ban them for being attention seeking twats.
- Banned
- #80
The question is your problem, buddy. You keep changing the question.
First it was "Is Matty Hayden the biggest downhill skier if the modern era?"
You were told no, that's ridiculous. You were given examples of tours and test matches which showed otherwise.
Stats were thrown around - which you ignored, or tried to play down with the ridiculous assertion that a mastery of sweep shots were somehow indicative of a simple, less-skilled batsman.
Then you relented, and the question became "In his career, did Matty Hayden fail against elite quicks when it really mattered?" Note the high amount of qualifiers in that question.
So again someone posted a block of statistics showing, no, that claim was ridiculous, too. Again, you ignored that. You picked and chose at stats to make your point. The farcical nature of your behaviour began to take a toll on the thread; your claims were met with increasing incredulity and eventual mockery.
Now your question is: is Matty Hayden the worst player to average over 50? Your parameters are even tighter now; stringent. Surely you've got your man?
It seems to me you asked a question and got an an answer you didn't like, much like in the thread the OP is in reference to.
So you ask again, a little differently, hoping for the answer you want. It's a confirmation question - actually a common sign in kids with learning disabilities.
You're like Charlie from Always Sunny pathetically stalking the waitress, continuously asking her out, too hilariously stupid to realise every successive effort does not bring him closer to a yes.
So no, I won't be answering your question; partly because it's a stupid question with an obvious answer; partly because it has already been answered multiple times; and partly because by not answering, your jimmies will be rustled to a level potentially never recorded by mankind.
And the best thing is, you'll think you're 'winning'. That's the thing about arguing on the internet with stupid people (as the old saying goes) - it's like playing chess with a pigeon; even if you win, the pigeon will just s**t on the board and strut off like it won anyway.
Here's a question for you, PaddyO : why don't you go * yourself?
First it was "Is Matty Hayden the biggest downhill skier if the modern era?"
You were told no, that's ridiculous. You were given examples of tours and test matches which showed otherwise.
Stats were thrown around - which you ignored, or tried to play down with the ridiculous assertion that a mastery of sweep shots were somehow indicative of a simple, less-skilled batsman.
Then you relented, and the question became "In his career, did Matty Hayden fail against elite quicks when it really mattered?" Note the high amount of qualifiers in that question.
So again someone posted a block of statistics showing, no, that claim was ridiculous, too. Again, you ignored that. You picked and chose at stats to make your point. The farcical nature of your behaviour began to take a toll on the thread; your claims were met with increasing incredulity and eventual mockery.
Now your question is: is Matty Hayden the worst player to average over 50? Your parameters are even tighter now; stringent. Surely you've got your man?
It seems to me you asked a question and got an an answer you didn't like, much like in the thread the OP is in reference to.
So you ask again, a little differently, hoping for the answer you want. It's a confirmation question - actually a common sign in kids with learning disabilities.
You're like Charlie from Always Sunny pathetically stalking the waitress, continuously asking her out, too hilariously stupid to realise every successive effort does not bring him closer to a yes.
So no, I won't be answering your question; partly because it's a stupid question with an obvious answer; partly because it has already been answered multiple times; and partly because by not answering, your jimmies will be rustled to a level potentially never recorded by mankind.
And the best thing is, you'll think you're 'winning'. That's the thing about arguing on the internet with stupid people (as the old saying goes) - it's like playing chess with a pigeon; even if you win, the pigeon will just s**t on the board and strut off like it won anyway.
Here's a question for you, PaddyO : why don't you go * yourself?
Eagle got a win
Cancelled
- Jun 30, 2009
- 1,840
- 1,960
- AFL Club
- West Coast
Hey guys can we close this thread now.
My team lost a grand final yesterday.
Has nothing to do with this thread but let's be honest this thread is s**t. I don't want anything s**t to remind me of the Grand Final.
My team lost a grand final yesterday.
Has nothing to do with this thread but let's be honest this thread is s**t. I don't want anything s**t to remind me of the Grand Final.
- Aug 5, 2012
- 2,878
- 4,613
- AFL Club
- Richmond
Someone that knows how to keep a pledge
- Banned
- #85
Straight on the board, right on cue.
Messenger
No, I’m just disappointed
- Status
