- Banned
- #26
Is the Sheffield Shield dead as a spectator sport?
It's dead as a spectator sport and a television sport.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Is the Sheffield Shield dead as a spectator sport?
Good point. The decline in Shield crowds started to happen when International cricket started being played in Australia every summer i.e. in the '70s. Prior to that Shield cricket was the pinnacle for fans during summers when there was no International cricket on offer. The post Christmas Vic v NSW game at the MCG used to pull some very good crowds, with both teams containing a number of Test players.The crowds were quite good in the late 80's early 90's. Games would usually start on Fridays and you'd get a couple of thousand each day on the weekends. When Hookes and Lehmann were going nuts in 1989 we got some great crowds at Adelaide Oval. The last session was always free so people would come down after work. Shield games used to be on free to air tv!
Blaming T20 is wrong. Blaming mid-week programming is wrong. The decline in Shield crowds started long before these came in.
Time poor society? More sedentary life styles with people preferring to get their sporting fix via television? I don't know.
Who are the people who were watching Shield cricket 25 years ago who aren't now? Maybe retirees used to go but the current batch don't?
I listened to two idiots on SEN one day discussing the point that seeing as nobody goes to Sheffield Shield anymore, they could save money by doing away with it altogether. Anyone purporting this notion understands little about the importance of honing players skills as they progress from grade to International level. It would be akin to throwing the baby out with the bath water. Sheffield Shield has been, and probably still is, the best local 1st class competition in the world, and a very large reason as to why Australia have been so strong in world cricket. It is a pity we do not see Test players dropping back to play Shield cricket any more as it was a vital learning experience for young players coming through.
I find it a great pity we have a new generation of cricket fans who understand little about the traditions of our game and the importance of Sheffield Shield cricket. Some may not even have heard of the concept. I also find it a great shame that we are catering to an audience who think the game is boring if two overs go by without at least one six or someone getting out. An audience who thinks the cricket season starts with the first ball of the Brisbane Test, and ends a little over 2 months later when the last silly shot is played in an International T20.
They haven't yet. Will do so soon unfortunately. CA ned to promote the shield more thoughSoon, or already have?
Do they, or have they written it off as an expense to feed the national team. You obviously won't have a dominant test team if your domestic comp is s**t, but it seems to me, considering the empty stadiums and pay TV coverage, that Shield games run at a loss at CA just absorbs it.They haven't yet. Will do so soon unfortunately. CA ned to promote the shield more though
Do they, or have they written it off as an expense to feed the national team. You obviously won't have a dominant test team if your domestic comp is s**t, but it seems to me, considering the empty stadiums and pay TV coverage, that Shield games run at a loss at CA just absorbs it.
I would guess that they see Shield as done and dusted, they can't scrap it because it would destroy the national team, but to promote it would be throwing good money after bad.There are so many conflivting things here it's not funny. As major stadiums continue to evolve, it's likely that loss makers like the Shield must move away from major venues at some point in time. Against that you have the fact that some states (such as Victoria) do not have an approved alternate First Clss facility. All well and good to take them to regional venues but that is a thing of the past unless they meet the standard - which I would suggest they won't.
Given the $$$ the game is generating it for now is a loss that the game can cover but that doesn't mean that CA should cease doing things to encourage people and mostly kiddies to attend.
These are the cricket Bogans that I speak of - the number of them increases every year - Aaron Finch is their God. Soon they will overtake us traditionalists and then what happens?
They haven't yet. Will do so soon unfortunately. CA ned to promote the shield more though
I've always had a dream that one season we would put International cricket to one side and really work on our local game. There are so many ordinary Test teams floating around these days, why not give it a miss, sign up 15 of the World's best players on ACB contracts for 6 months and have them scattered amongst the 6 Sheffield Shield teams which would already be bolstered by Australian Test players. You could run a proper Sheffield Shield competition, and enough limited over games to keep those fans happy, and the cricket would be very high quality.
It would promote Sheffield Shield beyond our wildest dreams, keep the cricket public happy, and for an International flavor, schedule some Australia v World XI games. Please don't tell me it will never happen because I already know it wouldn't. Just a dream is all. I still have great memories of Gary Sobers and Barry Richards playing for SA, and while I was watching SA in that era, who needed Test cricket?
Of course, you would need a State 2nd XI competition to keep the next level of players in the mix.
Something similar could have happened if CA agreed with Cricket South Africa to tour South Africa during the Christmas period. CA could have heavily promoted the domestic competition as an alternative for families to attend.I've always had a dream that one season we would put International cricket to one side and really work on our local game. There are so many ordinary Test teams floating around these days, why not give it a miss, sign up 15 of the World's best players on ACB contracts for 6 months and have them scattered amongst the 6 Sheffield Shield teams which would already be bolstered by Australian Test players. You could run a proper Sheffield Shield competition, and enough limited over games to keep those fans happy, and the cricket would be very high quality.
It would promote Sheffield Shield beyond our wildest dreams, keep the cricket public happy, and for an International flavor, schedule some Australia v World XI games. Please don't tell me it will never happen because I already know it wouldn't. Just a dream is all. I still have great memories of Gary Sobers and Barry Richards playing for SA, and while I was watching SA in that era, who needed Test cricket?
Of course, you would need a State 2nd XI competition to keep the next level of players in the mix.
Yes what a great way to destroy cricket in South Africa/New Zealand/Carribbean.
Great for you that you got to see Barry Richards, how much did South African's get to see of him?
I fail to see how 1 season would destroy cricket in those countries. Richards played nearly 20 summers of cricket for Natal, 1 of those was spent in South Australia. He also played with Hampshire for 10 years. Once again, I'm not sure what point you were making.
I have cricinfo up all day during a Shield match and share commentary with a mate but never translated this to actually attending a match although going to head down once the season resumes with my 4y old and let him run amuck on the grassy banks.