Pugsley
TheBrownDog
Seriously can this thread be closed? Clearly not going to go anywhere good.
Especially if Trevor Chappell has his say.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Seriously can this thread be closed? Clearly not going to go anywhere good.
Finally a common sense approach.The bouncer laws have changed in cricket back in the 80s and I think one day they may again. This sad situation should not be the reasons, but rather it should stimulate conversation amongst the cricketing bodies. When they have explored their reasons through study and feedback, hopefully the right decision is made.
I am in the minority and I accept that. In AFL, the head of a player is now sacrosanct. We are now more knowledgeable and understanding of what a blow to the head can cause both at the present time and in the future. The reason why the bouncer is feared is because of what happened to Hughes today, batsmen are placed in a precarious situation when a bowler delivers a bouncer that potentially could affect them and the batsmen for the rest of their lives. This is not the first time that a bouncer has caused damage and it wont be the last time.
I cannot think of many sports where a missile is deliberately aimed at an opponents head to "win" a game. I know there are many sports where head contact is encouraged, such as combat sports, cricket should never be placed in that category.
Most stupid post I've EVER read on bigfooty. Surely it's a troll?Many same about the shirtfront in footy.
Cricket will make changes to avoid an exodus in participation that is already in record low levels as well as attendance. Anyone thinking otherwise isn't thinking from a business point of view.
Finally a common sense approach.
Loosing the bounce won't result in a lesser spectecle but it will potentially save incidents from this happening.
Only the meat heads would think otherwise.
Finally a common sense approach.
Loosing the bounce won't result in a lesser spectecle but it will potentially save incidents from this happening.
Only the meat heads would think otherwise.
So really we should just put bowling machines at each end!!!!
Ok lets get rid of the bouncer and make it that you get a new ball every 30 overs, the pitches must be covered in grass so the bowler can apply his trade correctly.
FFS this was an accident that has by the way happened hundreds of times over the years, I still can't believe Abbott needs counselling!!! For what?
This was a freak accident which could possibly have been prevented with a different helmet design, better protective gear is a better direction to go in if action is to be taken.
Let's go further...after all, yorkers can risk players feet, and a hard hit ball could hurt a player.
Let's just have a bowling machine that bowls fullish balls outside off stump, with no fieldsmen. Probably better to have a robot batsman too.
You're forgetting spectators mate, sixes need to be eliminated to reduce fans getting injured. Players hitting hard cricket balls 100+ metres into a sea of people is way too dangerous surely?